Don Marquis’ Argument Against Abortion.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共29页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Don Marquis’ Argument Against Abortion

Don Marquis’ Argument Against Abortion On Marquis’ “An Argument that Abortion is Wrong” The Problem Addressed in this Paper The question addressed is: Is abortion wrong? Marquis’ answer: “[Abortion], except perhaps in rare instances, is seriously wrong.” Critique of Judith Thomson’s Argument Thomson tries to show that even if fetuses have a strong right to life, abortion is still often morally permissible. Thomson’s reasons are these. Thomson’s first reason: The body being used is the mother’s body. In a pregnancy, although the fetus uses the mother’s body as a life-support system, the mother does not use the fetus’ body as a life support system. Marquis’ rebuttal: In abortion the life that is lost is the fetus’, not the mother’s. Thomson’s second reason: A fetus’ right to life does not entail its right to use someone else’s body to preserve its life. Marquis’ rebuttal: A woman’s right to use her own body also does not entail her right to end someone else’s life in order to do what she wants with her body. Thomson’s third reason: The mother’s right to control her own body does not come to much if it is wrong for her to take any action that ends the life of the fetus. Marquis’ rebuttal: The fetus’ right to life does not come to much if a pregnant woman can end it when she chooses. Marquis’ conclusion about Thomson’s argument: A Thomsonian strategy for defending a general right to abortion does not succeed. Critique of Mary Warren’s Argument Here is Warren’s argument for abortion: (1) Only persons have the right to life. (2) Fetuses are not persons. ∴ (3) Fetuses do not have the right to life. Premise (2) seems obviously true. What are Warren’s reasons for premise (1)? According to Warren, morality rests on contractual foundation, and only persons are capable of entering into the moral contract. Hence only persons have rights. Marquis’ rebuttal: The contractarian approach fails because it cannot account for our duties to individuals who are not per

文档评论(0)

zhuwenmeijiale + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:7065136142000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档