Lecture12 Mohism II Oct 18 Chinese Philosophy Lectures杜兰大学中国哲学课堂教学PPT.ppt

下载文档 降价啦

8
0
约2.1千字
约 13页
2018-01-28 发布于浙江
举报
版权申诉
保障服务

Lecture12 Mohism II Oct 18 Chinese Philosophy Lectures杜兰大学中国哲学课堂教学PPT.ppt

1、本文档共13页，可阅读全部内容。
2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。

Lecture12 Mohism II Oct 18 Chinese Philosophy Lectures杜兰大学中国哲学课堂教学PPT

PHIL 2931 Mohism School of Names Schedule School of Mo Tzu Comparison with Confucianism Later Mohism Problems Comparison with Confucius Instead of Yao and Shun, Yu and Hsia Dynasty Argue that we should have universal love, not only love in five relationship with “degrees of love”. Idealistic Confucianism (esp. Mencius) vs. Practical Mo Tzu (such as: attitude on war) Against Ritual (Li) Mo Tzu strongly against ritual (Li) Think that it is a waste of resource. E.g. 3 years…. Chan 229-229 (passage 4) Practical use of resource vs. unfeeling Why Mencius thinks Mohism is a teaching of “animal” Against Music again, waste of energy Chan 227-228 (passage 3) Also against Confucianism Attitude to God and Spirit Argue that Confucius does not believe in God and spirits, which is a wrong attitude. May be a wrong understanding on Confucius’ philosophy But true that Confucius does not have such a strong attitude to God and Spirit as Mo Tzu. Inconsistency? Fung 57-58 Confucianism: does not care religion, but emphasize on Li. Mohism: does not care Li, but emphasize on religion. Solution: Confucianism- Moral; Mohism- benefit and consequence Destiny Argue that Confucians believe in destiny/determinism Chan 221-226, especially comment on 222 May be a wrong understanding on Confucianism (review Mencius’ philosophy here) Later Mohism Later Mohism clarifies some concepts further. Benefit and Harm “The beneficial is that with the obtaining of which one is pleased. The harmful is that with the obtaining of which one is displeased” (Ch. 40) (Fung, p. 122) Similar to Benthams utilitarianism. Universal Love Love All men. See Fung p. 123 for the logic of loving all and riding horses (an example of how logical) Minor: See the two objections and replies as well. (124-125) Problem Too ideal (universal love) Too practical (motivation on benefit) hard to achieve (eat little, wear bad clothes, no music, etc..) Later Mohism and School of Names They develop some logical arguments. Both later