2013年考研阅读文章T4精读——解析版.docx

2013年考研阅读文章T4精读——解析版.docx

  1. 1、本文档共3页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
2013年考研阅读文章T4精读——解析版

2013年考研阅读文章精读——解析版Text 4①On a five to three vote, the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday—a modest policy victory for the Obama Administration. ②But on the more important matter of the Constitution, the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration’s effort to upset the balance of power between the federal government and the states.*on a five to three vote 以5:3的投票*a modest policy victory一次小小的政治上的胜利*on the more important matter of the Constitution在宪法这一更为重要的问题上①In Arizona v. United States, the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona’s controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law. ②The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to “establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization” and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial. ③Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones.* overturn three of the four contested provisions推翻了四条有争议的法案中的三条*precede优于;在……之前*noncontroversial没有争议的* attempt to fashion the policy 试图改变政策*ran parallel to the existing federal ones.与现行联邦法律并驾齐驱①Justice Anthony Kennedy, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s liberals, ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun. ②On the overturned provisions the majority held the Congress had deliberately “occupied the field” and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal’s privileged powers.*On the overturned provisions在推翻的条款中*the majority held(that)绝大多数人认为*deliberately故意地蓄意地= on purpose * intrude on 打扰,干涉*the federal’s privileged powers政府享有的特权①However, the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement. ②That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.* verify 核查,查清*the legal status of people人们的法

文档评论(0)

yan698698 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档