n省非法口供排除规则运行情况调查报告word论文.docxVIP

AbstractThere are four components and the introduction of this thesis.The introduction of the concept of illegal confessions and the current laws against illegal confession exclusion rule defines connotation. In the perspective of the law, highlighting the process of change in the rules to exclude illegal confessions importance in todays justice system. This paper describes the research object and method.The first part of the way first collected through questionnaires moment N provincial criminal trial testimony to exclude illegal use case rules questionnaire covering six questions from the start, the investigation, identified three areas of illegal confessions show the status of implementation of specific exclusionary rule; Secondly, the use of real case to reflect the exclusion of illegal confessions rule in specific cases encountered in one of; third, the author of the relevant legal persons interviewed, who set including judges, prosecutors and lawyers. Information gathered during epitomized investigators handling the case of illegal confessions, problems encountered and the perfect recommendations. Finally, a brief summary of three ways to collect information reflects the similarities and differences. This chapter describes only an objective of the status quo, without making value evaluation.The second part of the province of illegal confessions to N actual operation of the exclusionary rule is based on assumed to exclude illegal confessions four noes real problem rules, namely: Illegal Confession exclusionary rule does not work, do not use, do not want to use, not use. It is the existence of these problems, the implementation of the rules to exclude illegal confessions situation is not optimistic, from the spirit of the legislation of the Criminal Procedure Code, requiring very far.The third part of the layers of review from the investigation of the case, prosecution, trial and defense sectors in four areas, in-depth look illegal confession exclusion rule caus