系统功能语言学加迪夫语法讲义.ppt

The Cardiff Grammar/Functional Syntactic Analysis Based on the Cardiff Model Schedule for This Course Overall introduction Introduction of functional elements and units Functional syntactic analysis of sentences: Step 1—marking clauses by figuring out the Main Verb, together with the Main Verb Extension(s) Step 2—finding the Subject, Operator, Auxiliary, Infinitive, Complement, Adjunct, Linker, Binder, Ender, implicit Subject and Complement, etc. Step 3—finding the deepest unit Step 4—analyzing groups Step 5—completing the whole tree diagram Statistic description Qualitative analysis Writing up a report Compulsory Readings Fawcett, R. 2000. A Theory of Syntax for Systemic Functional Linguistics. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 206. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Fawcett, R. 2008. Invitation to Systemic Functional Linguistics through the Cardiff Grammar. London: Equinox. Fawcett, R. Forthcoming. The Functional Syntax Handbook: Analyzing English at the Level of Form. London: Equinox. 黄国文、何伟等，2008，《系统功能语法入门：加的夫模式》。北京：北京大学出版社。 Lecture for Week 1 Overall Introduction Contents for Week 1 The common ground between the Sydney Grammar and the Cardiff Grammar Major differences between the Sydney Grammar and the Cardiff Grammar The main representative of the Cardiff Model Overall introduction of functional syntax within the framework of the SG and that within the CG The common ground The general approach to understanding language is functional rather than formal. --SFL is a theory of language as a choice between meanings; formal linguistics is a theory of language as a set of rules. --SFL places emphasis on paradigmatic rather than syntagmatic relations in language; syntactic structures are used to realize meanings. Major differences between the two models The Sydney Grammar says that the system networks of Transitivity, Mood and Theme are grammatical systems while the Cardiff Grammar proposes that they are true semantic systems. See 图示3 and 图示4 in 加的夫语法对悉尼语法的扩展.d