种粮行为与中国粮食生产流通市场化.doc

  1. 1、本文档共52页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
种粮行为与中国粮食生产流通市场化研究 ——基于农民种粮行为问卷数据 A Study on Marketization of the Grain Production and Distribution of China ——Based on Grain Production Behavior 2011年6月 【摘 要】中国粮食政策所面临的最大的选择是:粮食生产和流通主要应由政府主导还是市场主导?这在学术界分歧很大,政策走向也不明朗。要回答这个问题,就需要研究农民的种粮行为,尤其是对价格等利益信号的反应,分析粮食生产的外部性和弱质性以及粮食市场的竞争性等。为此,本研究调查了从人民公社时期的1976年到2008年的农民的种粮行为。研究发现,价格等利益信号直接影响农民对粮食生产的投入从而影响产量,农业的弱质性经不起严格考证,粮食市场具有最强的竞争性,农业具有弱负外部性而非流行的正外部性。由此得出结论:中国的粮食生产和流通应主要由市场主导。研究还发现,中国的粮食安全是一个被夸大了的问题,粮食有过量储存之嫌,确定国有粮企为流通主渠道是对粮食市场中其他参与者平等竞争的限制,从而影响流通的成本和效率,支农政策有悖论性质,城乡分隔的户籍制度是诸多“三农”问题的根源。 【关键词】种粮行为 粮食政策 市场主导 政府主导 Abstract The most important choice in grain policy formulation is whether the grain production and distribution should be government-oriented or market-oriented. The issue is debated heatedly in the academic circle, and the direction of the policy evaluation is ambiguous. To solve this issue, we have to study the grain production behavior of farmers, especially the reaction of the farmers to the interest signals,such as price etc., and understand some characteristics of agriculture,like externalities, weakness and competitiveness of grain market, based on which many scholars believe the government orientation is necessary. So, we conducted a survey of grain production behavior of farmers from 1976 in the period of the People’s Commune to 2008. The empirical study suggests that interest signals affect farmers’ decision on the inputs and therefore the output. Besides, we argue that the so-called weakness of agriculture is basically groundless, the competitiveness of the grain market is very strong, and the agriculture has the negative externalities rather than the positive externalities as most scholars believed. Therefore, it is concluded that the grain production and distribution should be oriented by the market, rather than by the government. It is also concluded that the issue of food security of China is somehow exaggerated, the grain is overstored, the policy of positioning the state-owned grain enterpris

文档评论(0)

xingyuxiaxiang + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档