【精品】国际能源效率需求侧管理(DSM)论坛.ppt

* * * * * [Fix graphic to be legible, understand “electricity” vs “primary”] It’s remarkable what we find when we isolate the opportunities related to buildings. First, all the CO2 abatement programs in buildings have positive return on investment. Second, with a total potential impact of almost 4Gt per year, they constitute more than half of the opportunities that have cost/benefit at breakeven or better - remember about 7Gt of the 27 Gt was at or below zero. [click back if helpful] Third, many of these abatement steps rely on existing technology (insulation is the runaway #1) - no invention is required. So all this represents very good news for prospects for improving the built environment. * [Fix graphic to be legible, understand “electricity” vs “primary”] It’s remarkable what we find when we isolate the opportunities related to buildings. First, all the CO2 abatement programs in buildings have positive return on investment. Second, with a total potential impact of almost 4Gt per year, they constitute more than half of the opportunities that have cost/benefit at breakeven or better - remember about 7Gt of the 27 Gt was at or below zero. [click back if helpful] Third, many of these abatement steps rely on existing technology (insulation is the runaway #1) - no invention is required. So all this represents very good news for prospects for improving the built environment. * * There are three principal sets of actions that can be taken to reduce GHG emissions from the energy sector. We are already implementing and will propose additional approaches to pursue all three of these avenues Both market based and conventional mandates can help Programmatic mandates are a cornerstone of California’s efforts in all three areas. Some measures, like building and appliance standards and procurement requirements push on more than one corner Many of these measures also address other goals: local air quality, save costs, diversify fuel risk, etc Standards can be thought