An Investigation of Justice in supply chain relationships and their参考.ppt

3.Methodology 3.5 Empirical approach Table 4 Regression results. 4. Results H1. When PJ is the constraining factor in a buyer–supplier relationship, focusing on PJ will result in significant increase in relationship performance in contrast to focusing on other justice dimensions. 4. Results H2. When DJ is the constraining factor in a buyer–supplier relationship, focusing on DJ will result in significant increase in relationship performance in contrast to focusing on other justice dimensions. 4. Results H3. When IJ is the constraining factor in a buyer–supplier relationship, focusing on IJ will result in significant increase in relationship performance in contrast to focusing on other justice dimensions. 5. Discussion and conclusion The study make san important contribution to the literature by delineating how justice dimensions, independently and interactively, lead to superior performance in buyer–supplier relationships in an outsourcing context. 5. Discussion and conclusion 5.1 Limitations and future research First：Research has shown that eliciting responses from a single respondent for both predictor and dependent variables result in common method variance (CMV). Second: In line with much of the work in the current supply chain literature, our data are from a single perspective, that of the buyer. (1)Consider collecting dyadic data in examining whether the CFM applies to both perspectives. (2) The CFM in the buyer–supplier relationship context provides one instance of an inter-organizational context. Future studies should examine whether CFM applies to other inter-organizational contexts such as alliances * An Investigation of Justice in supply chain relationships and theirperformance impact Catalogue Introduction 1 Theory development 2 Methodology 3 Dicussion and conclusion 5 Results 4 Abstract D C B A B： The role of justice in improving performance in supply chain relationships is an under-in