Applied Corporate Finance THE BASICS OF RISK参考.ppt

Applied Corporate Finance THE BASICS OF RISK参考.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共26页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Applied Corporate Finance THE BASICS OF RISK参考

This is a summary of the CAPM, before we get into the details. Note that the variance that the CAPM is built around is the variance of actual returns around an expected return. If you were an investor with a 1-year time horizon, and you bought a 1-year T.Bill, your actual returns (at least in nominal terms) will be equal to your expected return. It is riskfree. If you were the same investor, and you bought a stock (say Intel), your actual returns will almost certainly not be equal to your expected returns. In practice, we often look at historical (past) returns to estimate variances. Implicitly, we are assuming that this variance is a good proxy for expected future variance. Disney’s stock price has been volatile, yielding a standard deviation of 19.36% (on an annualized basis) between 12004 and 2008. If you were an investor looking at Disney in 2009, what concerns (if any) would you have in using this as your measure of the forward looking risk in Disney stock? Disney as a company changed over this period. The standard deviation from the past may not be a good indicator or future risk. If historical standard deviations are your only way of estimating risk, it makes it impossible to measure risk in non-traded assets. While some people may be indifferent, most pick investment A. The possibility of a high payoff, even though it is captured in the expected value, seems to tilt investors. In statistical terms, this can be viewed as evidence that investors prefer positive skewness (high positive payoffs) and value it. It is a direct contradiction to the mean-variance framework that underlies so much of conventional risk theory. Once you add the possibility that the big positive jumps are matched by the possibility of big negative jumps, the game changes again. This propensity, called kurtosis, is not desirable to most investors. In the real world, investments reveal far too much skewness and kurtosis than would be expected in the standard normal distribution. In fact,

文档评论(0)

2017meng + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档