Econometric analysis Discrete Choice Modeling参考.ppt

Econometric analysis Discrete Choice Modeling参考.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共113页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Econometric analysis Discrete Choice Modeling参考

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * A Random Effects Approach Allenby and Rossi, “Marketing Models of Consumer Heterogeneity” Discrete Choice Model – Brand Choice “Hierarchical Bayes” Multinomial Probit Panel Data: Purchases of 4 brands of Ketchup Structure Bayesian Priors Bayesian Estimator Joint Posterior= Integral does not exist in closed form. Estimate by random samples from the joint posterior. Full joint posterior is not known, so not possible to sample from the joint posterior. Gibbs Sampling: Target: Sample from f(x1, x2) = joint distribution Joint distribution is unknown or it is not possible to sample from the joint distribution. Assumed: f(x1|x2) and f(x2|x1) both known and samples can be drawn from both. Gibbs sampling: Obtain one draw from x1,x2 by many cycles between x1|x2 and x2|x1. Start x1,0 anywhere in the right range. Draw x2,0 from x2|x1,0. Return to x1,1 from x1|x2,0 and so on. Several thousand cycles produces a draw Repeat several thousand times to produce a sample Average the draws to estimate the marginal means. Gibbs Cycles for the MNP Model Samples from the marginal posteriors Results Individual parameter vectors and disturbance variances Individual estimates of choice probabilities The same as the “random parameters model” with slightly different weights. Allenby and Rossi call the classical method an “approximate Bayesian” approach. (Greene calls the Bayesian estimator an “approximate random parameters model”) Who’s right? Bayesian layers on implausible priors and calls the results “exact.” Classical is strongly parametric. Neither is right – Both are right. Comparison of Maximum Simulated Likelihood and Hierarchical Bayes Ken Train: “A Comparison of Hierarchical Bayes and Maximum Simulated Likelihood for Mixed Logit” Mixed Logit Stochastic Structure – Conditional Likelihood Note individual specific parameter v

文档评论(0)

2017meng + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档