有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站- 1、本文档共5页，可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站引擎训练作业
八年制临床医学文献检索实习五
姓名：陈怡 学号：u200910455专业：临床八年 班级：09协和
实习内容：有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站引擎等
了解中国四大主干网和重要卫生与信息管理机构：中国医学科学院医学信息研究所、中华人民共和国卫生部、中国疾病预防控制中心、国家科技图书文献中心。
二、通过Google学术有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站网，有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站你感兴趣的主题内容。
选取一篇进入CBM有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站即得。
三、医学有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站引擎（需要注册才能获取原文文献，尽量查找到原文）
1、利用有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站引擎在“Specialty Sites”栏目中检索“Infectious diseases”类中的“HIV”主题方面的文献信息。
第一篇在PubMed中查找
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr.?2011 Dec 15;58(5):e127-34.
Safety and efficacy of the PrePex device for rapid scale-up of?male circumcision for HIV prevention in resource-limited settings.
资源PrePex设备男性包皮环切预防艾滋病安全Bitega JP,?Ngeruka ML,?Hategekimana T,?Asiimwe A,?Binagwaho A.
Source
Kanombe Military Hospital, Kigali, Rwanda.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
To assess the safety and efficacy of the PrePex device for?nonsurgical?circumcision?in?adult?males as part of a comprehensive HIV prevention program in Rwanda.
METHODS:
Single-center 6-week noncontrolled study in which healthy men underwent?circumcision?using the PrePex device, which employs fitted rings to clamp the foreskin, leading to distal necrosis. In the first phase of the study, the feasibility of the procedure was tested on 5 subjects in a sterile environment; in the main phase, an additional 50 subjects were circumcised in a nonsterile setting by physicians or a nurse. Outcome measures included the rate of successfulcircumcision, time to complete healing, pain, and adverse events.
RESULTS:
In the feasibility phase, all 5 subjects achieved complete?circumcision?without adverse events. In the main phase, all 50 subjects achieved?circumcision?with 1 case of diffuse edema after device removal, which resolved with minimal intervention. Pain was minimal except briefly during device removal (day 7 after placement in most cases). The entire procedure was bloodless, requiring no anesthesia, no suturing, and no sterile settings. Subjects had no sick/absent days associated with the procedure. Median time for complete healing was 21 days after device removal. There were no instances of erroneous placement and no mechanical
文档评论（0）