- 1、本文档共37页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
2010年CDM机制下DOE评级报告wwf
2010 Rating of Designated Oper-
ational Entities (DOEs) accredited
under the Clean Development Mecha-
nism (CDM)
Report for WWF Berlin, 28 July 2010
Corrected version1
Lambert Schneider
Lennart Mohr
1
The date of re-accreditation of DNV in Table 4 on page 18 was corrected.
Öko-Institut 2010 Rating of DOEs
Executive Summary
Designated Operational Entities (DOEs) are accredited independent entities respon-
sible for ensuring that proposed projects under the Clean Development Mechanism
(CDM) meet all requirements established by the CDM Executive Board operating under
the Kyoto Protocol. In May 2009, Öko-Institut and WWF published a first rating of
DOEs. The rating aims to provide transparent information to the market with regards to
how well DOEs are fulfilling the requirements and expectations of the CDM Executive
Board. This report updates the rating and in addition evaluates the current validation
and verification process and provides recommendations for improvements.
The rating is based on a statistical evaluation of decisions by the CDM Executive Board
on projects that were validated positively by a DOE. The CDM Executive Board may
automatically register a project if it concurs with the positive validation opinion of the
DOE or may require corrections or reject a project if the validation is not deemed ap-
propriate. The percentage of projects registered, rejected, reviewed or for which correc-
tions are requested is used to assess the performance of DOEs. The rationale for such
a statistical approach is that the registration success expresses on average, over many
projects, the extent to which the DOEs are meeting the expectations of the Board. For
example, a DOE with a high
文档评论(0)