Jurisprudence - Northwestern University School of Law:西北大学法学院法理学-[精品].doc

Jurisprudence - Northwestern University School of Law:西北大学法学院法理学-[精品].doc

  1. 1、本文档共43页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Jurisprudence - Northwestern University School of Law:西北大学法学院法理学-[精品]

Jurisprudence The heuristic value of jurisprudence- uncovers the structure of where your argument is coming from and helps you conceptualize other related arguments that will help you. Where does the law come from? What is its scope? -Not all of human existence is encompassed by law. -All of human existence falls under legal thought. You can get a yes or no to anything you ask. -Law only exists when it speaks to answer a question. When no question is asked, law does not exist. Positivism would say that there are pockets of human existence that are not covered by the law. Natural law, on the other hand, is pervasive, all around. Every case is unique but the law is a generalization. In that way every case involves facts that are not covered by current law. That does not mean that we always say the law is silent on the issue. As lawyers, with an unknown variety of cases to be brought to us, we do not have the liberty to declare ourselves beholden to one philosophy or another. A judge may be able to say “I am a natural lawyer,” but a lawyer cannot. We must be more heuristic, knowing each of the possible philosophies and be able to apply them comfortably. Is Jurisprudence concerned with how we as advocates should analyze and argue what the law is, or is it concerned with what occurs inside a judge’s head? Maybe it’s both or it’s neither. We can look into a judge’s head by reviewing previous decisions or what arguments worked and which didn’t. We can use our own philosophies to figure out how to better persuade other people. This involves how the judge conceives his/her role. Lord Devlin conceptualizes his role as representative of the people. He’s visiting society’s ideas upon the defendants who appear before him. Another category of judges are the benevolent dictators, like Posner, who believe that they are going to make rules which will then be imposed because they are considering what is in the best interests of the public. Case of the Speluncean Explor

文档评论(0)

bodkd + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档