护理干预对腹膜透析患者生存质量的影响1.doc

护理干预对腹膜透析患者生存质量的影响1.doc

  1. 1、本文档共5页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
护理干预对腹膜透析患者生存质量的影响1

护理干预对腹膜透析患者生存质量的影响 河南省南阳市中心医院肾病科 高宏华 473009 摘要 目的 探讨护理干预对持续性非卧床性腹膜透析(CAPD)患者生存质量的影响。方法 将2003年1月~2007年6月出院后行CAPD患者40例随机分为对照组(22)例和观察组(18)例,对照组由各班护士对患者及家属进行腹膜透析规范化培训,而观察组则由专职腹膜透析护士负责对患者及家属进行规范化培训和定期家庭随访。比较两组术后6个月末和12个月末时导管出口感染、腹膜炎、引流不畅、心血管事件发生率及主观综合性营养评估(SGA评分)。结果 术后6个月末时,观察组患者导管出口感染率、腹膜炎发生率、引流不畅发生率明显低于对照组,有统计学差异(P<0.01)。术后12个月末时,观察组导管出口感染率、腹膜炎发生率、引流不畅发生率、心血管事件发生率均明显低于对照组,观察组主观综合性营养评估(SGA评分)明显优于对照组,有统计学差异(P<0.01)。结论 对CAPD患者进行护理干预能降低并发症的发生率,改善患者营养状况,从而提高患者生存质量。 关键词 护理干预 腹膜透析 生存质量 Nursing Intervention on peritoneal dialysis patients quality of life Abstract Objective Discussion of continuing nursing intervention of non-ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients quality of life. Methods Will be January 2003 to June 2007 and discharged later, 40 cases of CAPD patients were randomly divided into control group (22) and with the observation group (18) of the control group by the class of nurses to patients and their families on peritoneal dialysis standardized training, and the observation group from full-time nurses are responsible for peritoneal dialysis patients and their families for standardized training and regular follow-up family. Comparison of the two groups after the end of 6 and 12 at the end of the export catheter infections, peritonitis, poor drainage, and the incidence of cardiovascular events subjective comprehensive nutritional assessment (SGA score). Results After six at the end of the observation group with catheter export infection, the incidence of peritonitis, poor drainage rate was significantly lower than the control group, respectively (P 0.01). After 12 at the end of the observation group catheter export infection, the incidence of peritonitis, the incidence of poor drainage, and the incidence of cardiovascular events were significantly lower than the control group, the Observer Group subjective comprehensive nutritional assessment (SGA score) was significantly better than control group, a significant difference (P 0.01). Conclusion C

文档评论(0)

jgx3536 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:6111134150000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档