丰子恺与厨川白村文艺思想比较研究论文论文.docVIP

丰子恺与厨川白村文艺思想比较研究 Abstract Feng Zikai translated The Symbol of Depression, written by Kuriyagawahakuson, a famous writer of literary theory in the time of Taisyo in Japan, agreed with Kuriyagawahakuson’s idea that “literature and art are the symbol of depression”, said that his articles were exactly “the symbol of dual nature depression”. However, how much had Kuriyagawahakuson’s literary viewpoints influenced Feng Zikai’s literary creation in his early stage? This question was seldom explored before, I’d like to reveal the similarities and differences in their literary viewpoints, and to show Feng Zikai’sunique literary outlook on life through comparing their literary viewpoints. The first chapter “Literature and Art are the Symbol of Depression”. This chapter states that it’s “bitters of life”said by Kuriyagawahakuson that evoked Feng Zikai’s sympathy and there was evident Kuriyagawahakuson’s stamp in Feng Zikai’s explanations of “bitters of life ”. They identified with each other in the function of “depression”to literary creation and the function of arts to people’s spiritual freedom. However, Feng Zikai’s religious belief and the nurture of Chinese traditional culture made him have a kind of religious feelings and Confucian cultural care in his comprehension of “depression”. Furthermore, different cultural backgrounds and life experiences made them generate different views on “literature and art and morals ”. The second chapter “Artistic Life ”. It is acknowledged that both Feng Zikai and Kuriyagawahakuson valued the importance of character and subjectivity to literary creation, and the relation between arts and life, and they made efforts in seeking the balance between the two. However, Kuriyagawahakuson stressed people ’s spiritual world, pursuing man’s spiritual freedom and character liberation, while Feng Zikai paid more attention to the value of individual life and humane care and love. The third chapter “Walk out of the Ivory Tower”. Kuriyagawahakuson emph