- 1、本文档共11页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
微创根管治疗对牙冠抗折裂性能影响实验研究
微创根管治疗对牙冠抗折裂性能影响实验研究
[摘要]目的:比较微创根管治疗方法与传统治疗方法对牙冠抗折裂性能影响的差异性。方法:选择成年健康男性恒磨牙50颗,随机分为实验组和对照组。对照组按照传统根管治疗方法进行处理,实验组采用CT定位、微孔开髓法进行根管治疗。比较分析两组离体牙出现冠折裂隙时受到的最大载荷和离体牙的折裂方式。结果:实验组样本出现裂隙时受到的最大载荷为(780.12±86.50)N,对照组样本出现裂隙时受到的最大载荷为(458.72±46.19)N,两组间存在显著性差异。在所有标本试件中,16%的牙体折裂线通过髓腔中央,20%的牙体折裂线远离开髓孔边缘,最为多见的折裂方式为折裂线通过开髓孔边缘,占64%,其中对照组中发生比例更高。两组的折裂方式存在显著性差异。结论:微创根管治疗方法可降低牙冠折裂的危险性,提高根管治疗患牙的临床效果。
[关键词]微创;根管治疗;折裂
[中图分类号]R783 [文献标识码]A [文章编号]1008-6455(2011)04-0640-03
The effects of minimally invasive root canal treatment on the anti-fracture characters of tooth crown
ZHU Jing1,JIAO Hong-wei2
(1.Department of Endodontics, Shanghai Stomatological Disease Center,Shanghai 200031,China;2.Department of Preventive Dentistry,Shanghai Stomatological Disease Center)
Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effect of minimally invasive root canal treatment for fractures of crown and compare it with that of conventional treatment methods. Methods Fifty healthy adult men permanent molars were randomly divided into experimental and control groups.The control group received conventional root canal treatment.The experimental group were located the root canal in facial projection by Micro CT, and received minimally invasive root canal treatment.The maximum load and fracture situation of the two groups of teeth were compared when specimens fractured in dental crown. Results We found that the maximum load of crown fracture was significantly different between experimental groups(780.12 ± 86.50N)control group (458.72±46.19)N.16% crown fracture line were through the canal central, 20 percent of crown fracture line were far away from fillings, and the most common fracture lines passed through marginal of filings,accounting for 64 percent.There was a significant difference fracture situation between two groups. Conclusion The minimally invasive root canal treatment can reduce the risk of crown fracture,and improve the clinical effect of root canal treatment of teeth.
Key words:minimall
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- UDC-311AG线路保护测控装置说明书(国网常规站版).pdf VIP
- 中国国家标准 GB/T 1919-2023工业氢氧化钾.pdf
- GB6245-2006 消防泵国家强制标准.pdf
- 《制作精美的卡片》(课件)五年级上册综合实践活动全国通用.pptx
- 紧凑型固体高次谐波产生和谐波谱探测装置及其方法.pdf VIP
- 大连理工大学2021-2022学年第1学期《高等数学(上)》期末考试试卷(A卷)及标准答案.pdf
- 幼儿园小班科学《春天来了》课件 课件.pptx VIP
- 第三章 中世纪西欧基督教文化.ppt
- 中华人民共和国国家标准-食品安全国家标准发酵乳.pdf VIP
- 云仓课件教学课件.pptx VIP
文档评论(0)