两种口腔卫生宣教方式对固定矫治患者口腔卫生的影响.doc

两种口腔卫生宣教方式对固定矫治患者口腔卫生的影响 2010年8月 第32卷第4期 农垦医学 JournalofNongkenMedicine Aug.2010 V01.32No.4 [2] [3] [4] DuunSM,BrysonJM,KoskinPL,eta1.Developmentofthedia— betesknowledge(DKN)scales:formDKN,DKNBandDKNC[J]. DiabetesCare,2003,7:36～37 KarlanderSG,Alindet1,HellstromK.Knowledgeofdiabetes mellitus,dietsandnutritionindiabeticpatients[J].ActaMed Scand,2002,207:48～49 MoriskyDE,GreenLW,LevineDM.Concurrentandpredictive validityofaseffreportme~nreofmedicationadherence[J].Med Care,1986,24:67～74 [5]范丽风,潘长玉,田慧,等.全程糖尿病健康教育模式的建立 与实践fJ].中华护理杂志,2001,36(4):249—252 [收稿日期:2010—07—28] 两种口腔卫生宣教方式对固定矫治患者口腔卫生的影响 阮晓慧宋锦鳞2李丽华2 (1.新疆医科大学第二附属医院口腔科,新疆乌鲁木齐,830028; 2.重庆医科大学附属口腔医院正畸科,重庆,400015) 【摘要】目的:观察两种口腔卫生宣教方式对固定矫治患者口腔卫生的影响,寻求较佳的口腔卫生宣教方式.方 法:选择准备行固定矫治患者40例,随机分为两组:口述组(A组)和多媒体组(B组).每组男女各lO人.选择l6, 26,31,4l四颗牙,检查l6,26的近远中唇(颊)面以及31,41的唇面和舌面,于固定矫治开始时及开始后1月,3月,6 月分别检测牙龈指数(gi嚼valindex,GI)和菌斑指数(plaqueindex,PLI).结果:lZl述组的GI和PLI明显高于多媒 体组,差异有统计学意义(Plt;0.01).结论:对固定矫治患者进行口腔卫生宣教时采用多媒体形式效果更好. 【关键词】固定矫治;口腔卫生宣教 中图分类号:R197.323文献标识码:A EffectivenessOfTheOralHealthStatusWithTwoOralHygiene InstructionForFixedAppliances RUANXiao.hui,SONGJing.1in,LILi—hua (1.DepartmentofStomatology,theAffiliatedSecondHospital,XinjiangMedicalUniversity,Urumqi,830028; 2.DepartmentofOrthodontics,theAffiliatedHospitalofStomatology,ChongqingMedicalUniversity,Chongqing,400015) 【Abstract】Objective:Toevaluatetheeffeetiontheoralhealthstatusintwooralhealtheducationprogramsamong fixedAppliances.Methods:Foaypatientswhoweredecidedtohavefixedorthodonticappliancerandomlychosenweredi- videdintotwogroups:oralHygieneInstruction(GroupA)andVideotapeHygieneInstruction(GroupB).Afollow—upex- aminationwascarriedoutinbeforefixedAppliancesand1month,3monthand6monthafterfixedAppliances.Theoral healthstatuswasscoredaccordingtoparameters:gingivalindex(GI),plaqueindex(PLI)in.Results:Significantdiffer- entswerefoundinGI,PLIinpatientswhofixedAppliancesoralusingHygieneInstructionandVideotapeHygieneInstruc- tion.ThesevaluessignificantlygreaterinoralHygieneInstructionthenVid