- 1、本文档共36页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
关于霍菲尔德“特权”概念的分析-an analysis of hoefelds concept of
AbstractHohfeld’sRightTheoryhasitsuniquesignificanceandprofoundeffectontheresearch historyoflegalright.Hohfeldcreatedeight“FundamentalLegalConcepts”whichgathered oppositionfromvarioussides.Therehavenoexactconclusionsonthesedisputes,including howtointerpretthoseconcepts,whethertheystrictlyfollowtheHohfeld’sdesignandhave legal practical significance?Thekeyto solvingthosequestions lies in howto interpret “privilege”inthoseeightconcepts.TherearenotalotofessaysonHohfeldinChinaandfew ofthemarespecializedinstudying“privilege”.Therefore,thispaperattemptstoexpoundthe originalintentionandintendmentofHohfeld’s“privilege”fromthreeaspects,including logic, connotationandlegality,revealHohfeld’suniquewayoftreatinglegalconceptsand meanwhile clarifythe importanceof Hohfeld’s consciousness of problems.TheintroductionofthispaperintroducesHohfeld’slifeandhisworksandelaboratesthe valueofthisthesisandrelevantresearchstatusathomeandabroad.Thenitillustratesthe writingfeaturesanddifficultiesofthispaper.Atlast,itintroducesthewritingideasofthis paper concisely.Thefistchapterofthispaperstartswiththelogicalrelationshipof“privilege”givenby Hohfeldandmainlyanalyzesthe“correlative”and“opposite”relationshipof“privilege”. Firstly,itprovesthat“privilege”isakindofjuralrelations,whichisalsothebasisofthis paper.Thenitdemonstrateswhatthejuralrelationof“privilege”islike.Atlast,itexpounds whatthelogicsignificanceofHohfeld’srelationshipscheduleisaftermakingabrief summaryof thedemonstration in this part.Thesecondchapterofthispapercentersonpredecessors’argumentaboutHohfeld’s “privilege”whichisalsoknownasquestioningthequalityof“privilege”asa“Fundamental LegalConcept”.Theauthorwilldiscussthosequestionsbydividingthemintotwoaspects: firstly,discusswhether“privilege”has“fundamentality”.Inotherword,whether“privilege” canbereducedbyotherlegalconcepts.Theauthorcompares“privilege”to“right”with which“privilege”ismosteasilyconfusedanddrawstheconclusionthat“privilege”indeed hasitsirreplaceablesignificance;secondly,discus
您可能关注的文档
- 共青团组织参与社会管理的问题及对策分析-problems and countermeasures of communist youth league organizations participating in social management.docx
- 共生·分离·认同—从精神分析女性主义视角解读《妈妈走了》-symbiosis, separation and identification - interpretation of.docx
- 共生·共存·共建——滨河空间的景观与生态分析-symbiosis, coexistence and co - construction - landscape and ecological analysis of riverside space.docx
- 共生·分离·认同——从精神分析女性主义视角解读《妈妈走了》-symbiosis, separation and identification - interpretation of.docx
- 共同侵权若干问题分析-analysis on several problems of joint infringement.docx
- 共同饮酒人对同饮者损害责任承担案例分析-case analysis of joint drinkers' liability for damages caused by joint drinkers.docx
- 共同饮酒引发的交通事故损害赔偿责任承担问题研究—以王某 何某诉白某人身损害赔偿纠纷案为例-research on the liability of traffic accident damages caused by joint drinking - a case study of wang he a v bai a personal damages dispute case.docx
- 共同正犯若干问题分析-analysis on several problems of joint principal offender.docx
- 共同致害行为过程中的正当防卫认定分析——以梁某某故意伤害案为例-analysis of justifiable defense identification in the process of joint harm - causing behavior - taking liang mou - mou's intentional harm case as an example.docx
- 共赢理论在移动网上营业厅项目中的应用与分析-application and analysis of win-win theory in mobile online business hall project.docx
文档评论(0)