关于敲诈勒索罪的定性分析——以张舒娟敲诈勒索一案为例-qualitative analysis of extortion crime - taking zhang shujuans extortion case as an example.docx

下载文档 降价啦

30
0
约1.95万字
约 24页
2018-06-05 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉
保障服务

关于敲诈勒索罪的定性分析——以张舒娟敲诈勒索一案为例-qualitative analysis of extortion crime - taking zhang shujuans extortion case as an example.docx

1、本文档共24页，可阅读全部内容。
2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。

关于敲诈勒索罪的定性分析——以张舒娟敲诈勒索一案为例-qualitative analysis of extortion crime - taking zhang shujuans extortion case as an example

AbstractCrimeistheessenceofviolationsoftherightofothers,thetaskistoprotecttherightsof criminallaw,Intoday’srapideconomicdevelopment,extortionhasbecomeamorecommon economiccrimes.Inpracticeandtheoryarealsogreatdifferenceintheconceptofextortion components,Zuiyufeizui,thiscrimeandothercrimes,penalties,etc.Thereare controversial.Especiallyinthejudicialpracticerarelyunprovokedactsofextortionto others,alwaysusesomejustificationorexcuse,thatextortionisgenerallyaccompaniedby acertainamountofexerciseandtherightbehavior,howtocorrectlygraspthepenalcode forextortionprovisionsofthecrime,extortionexplicitlyprotectedlegalinterests,todistinguish betweenactsofestortionsubjectivebetweenchanges,andaccuratelydistinguishbetween legitimateexerciseoftheirrightbehaviorandactuallintimidation,Lefiscalrelationshipbetween therightsofcriminallawprotectionfunctionstoachieveanimportantelement,hasavery important practical significance.This addition to theintroduction of four parts.Thefirstpartisthecaseofthebasicsituation.Thissectionandthecauseofaction,its case,thefocusofdebateanddisagreementcomposedoffoursections.Thefirstsectionof Proposal: ZhangShujuanextortion ; secondplateofits case:This sectiondescribesthe useof deceptiondefendantZhangShujuanabductionstudentswearingLeitoNanjing,andNanjing, HungHingstayinginhoteltoDaiLei,wouldbeindangerbydemandingmoneytoweara parentsbehavior.Inthemeantime,ZhangShujuandeclarationsarenotallowedtowearthe parentalarm,otherwisethere willbedangerofwearinglei.After DaiLeiZhangShujuanout ofthemachinetotakeadvantageofcontactwiththeirfamilies,undertheguidanceofhis familytoleavethehoteltothelocalpublicsecurityauthoritiesforhelp,Huaianpolicein Nanjing,thedefendantZhangShujuanarrested;thirdsectionindicatesthatthecaseinthe courseofthe trial , both theprosecution and the defensedisagreement . Publicprosecutor that : theuseofcaseZhangShujuanLeiDaiDaiparenttoitschildsafetyconcernsandextort money,obtainbenefits,inlinewithelementsofthecrimekidnapping,shouldbeconvicted ofkidnapping