- 1、本文档共16页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Evaluating Content on the Web: Rules, Strategies, and Foundational Concepts
Abstract
In this paper I will outline the beginnings of a general method for evaluating Web sites and their content.
The method of evaluation is presented as part of a simple, interactive question method for learning on the Web. The learning method, in an effort to appeal to the average Web learner, focuses almost exclusively on how to learn and critically evaluate Web sites and content found with conventional search engines.
Many useful guides for how to evaluate Web sites and their content have been published by libraries at reputable institutions. This method is offered as a supplemental resource treating some aspects of evaluation that are sometimes overlooked in standard evaluation guides. These aspects include how to approach the evaluation of the truth or plausibility of claims on a Web site as opposed to merely evaluating the ‘credibility’ of the site and how to relate Web site evaluation to the general development of learning and the acquisition of knowledge.
Finally, the method will discuss presumptive reasoning as a useful tool for Web evaluation and present some simple examples.
Introduction
In this paper I will offer a very broad outline of a method for how to evaluate Web sites and their content that, it is hoped, will prove useful to teachers, librarians, students, and perhaps to the average Internet user. But, before we get to that, we should confront the obvious and rather troubling fact that attempting to formulate such a method is, strictly speaking, quite absurd. There is no method that would allow a person to evaluate all Web sites and their content. A more reasonable approach, one might argue, is develop one’s knowledge and critical abilities as best one can, that is, get a good education, learn something about how the Internet works, how to use it, and then get on with learning and the critical evaluation that goes with it. There is wisdom in this advice and it may s
您可能关注的文档
- 糖精废水深度处理试验报告.docx
- 高中地理教材-自然地理与人文地理部分.docx
- 埃斯伯格症教师指南.docx
- 最近比较烦--合理的情绪宣泄.doc
- 自然灾害引发生产安全事故应急预案.doc
- 转基因生物安全性评价.doc
- 转Bt基因棉花种子和棉花籽油的致突变性研究.doc
- 专卖店运营管理手册-店长认证工作流程.doc
- 重点产业振兴和技术改造-糖精钠的质量安全检测项目-资金申请报告.doc
- 中学物理中考前提优冲刺练习题1-7.doc
- 北师大版小学数学三年级上册《寄书》教学设计.docx
- 统编版(部编版)语文二年级上册《雪孩子》教学设计.docx
- 统编版(部编版)语文二年级上册《八角楼上》教学设计.docx
- 北师大版小学数学三年级上册《长方形周长》教学设计.docx
- 北师大版小学数学三年级上册《丰收了》教学设计.docx
- 统编版(部编版)语文二年级上册《夜宿山寺》教学设计.docx
- 统编版(部编版)语文二年级上册《风娃娃》教学设计.docx
- 统编版(部编版)语文二年级上册《朱德的扁担》教学设计.docx
- 统编版(部编版)语文二年级上册《难忘的泼水节》教学设计.docx
- 统编版(部编版)语文二年级上册《纸船和风筝》教学设计.docx
文档评论(0)