- 1、本文档共40页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
The Systematic Review Process - University of Washington:系统回顾-华盛顿大学
Katherine * Katherine: In addition to study population (diseases/conditions to be included, e.g, SCI in our example), this also includes: * Katherine * Katherine: You’ll want to categorize your articles once you have gathered them all. Here is an example from Measuring depression in persons with spinal cord injury: A systematic review * Katherine: ABREVIATED LIST: Keep in mind that this classification system is ONLY to help determine which studies should be included in the review and is NOT related to grading the evidence. We will discuss grading in a few minutes. * Katherine * Katherine---This is an end of good planning. Common for publication---is a diagram of your methodology! If did all things correctly you should be able to create one of these. * Pat: Earlier, we talked about some of the issues around evidence in rehab. Let’s talk now about some of the most common approaches to evaluating or ‘grading’ the evidence. * * * Pat: so far, we’ve highlighted some of the most problematic steps in the process, namely: developing a good clinical question, creating a plan, categorizing the articles, and grading the evidence. Next, we’ll talk about creating consumer clinical materials from your review. * kurt * Pat: We’re now ready to take the next step develop user products from our systematic review. * Pat * Pat * Pat * * AAN Evidence classified class I (low risk of bias) through IV (very high risk of bias) Evidence graded A (consistent with class 1 studies) and recommend treatment as established as safe and effective through D (class 4 studies or a mix of 4 classes). Insufficient evidence to support a conclusion of effectiveness GRADE Classified high, moderate, low and very low Randomized trial = high Observational study = low Any other evidence = very low Note: in GRADE, look at study design first but there are many other criteria to consider in assigning a grade of evidence Recommendations (strong or weak) based on classification Steps in Conducting a Sy
您可能关注的文档
- Teething Notes - Wikispaces:出牙笔记- wiki空间.ppt
- TCP-IP培训教程笔记.ppt
- TEM4(听力).ppt
- TEM4听力词汇温习.ppt
- Tet1蛋白在ES细胞未分化状态维持和内细胞团特化中的功能.ppt
- TFCAS2.1功能及配置介绍-视博.ppt
- The Acoustic Reflex声反射.ppt
- TGP联合血管内皮抑素治疗早期尿路上皮癌患者初步临床研究.ppt
- That Wasn’t Supposed to Happen - Yale University:这是不应该发生的事情-耶鲁大学.ppt
- The Capabilities Approach of Disability - UNICEF能力方法的残疾-联合国儿童基金会.ppt
文档评论(0)