创复康喷剂抗感染及对大鼠创伤感染模型的il-6影响的分析-anti - infection effect of chuanfukang spray and its effect on il - 6 in rats with traumatic infection model.docx

new r ol e of St aphyl ococcus aur eus suscept i bi l i t y t o peni ci l l i n t abl et s no obvi ous. Wound heal i ng spr ay t he r ol e of Pseudomonas aer ugi nosa peni ci l l i n t han obvi ous eff ect on E. col i was no si gni f i cant di ff er ence. Wound heal i ng spr ay st andar d st r ai n of St aphyl ococcus aur eus MI C f or t he 31. 5mg/ ml , MBC i s 62. 5mg/ ml , on t he E. col i MI C f or t he 62. 5mg/ ml , MBC i s 62. 5mg/ ml , on Pseudomonas Pseudomonas MI C f or t he 31. 5mg/ ml , MBC i s 125mg/ ml ; of cl i ni cal st r ai ns of St aphyl ococcus aur eus MI C f or t he 62. 5mg/ ml , MBC was 125mg/ ml , on t he E. col i MI C was 125mg / ml , MBC was 125mg/ ml , MI C agai nst P. aer ugi nosa was 62. 5mg/ ml , MBC i s 250mg/ ml .Wound heal i ng spr ay i nf l ammat or y medi at or s I L- 6 on t he i mpact ofexper i ment al r esul t s show t hat Model Gr oup 1 Gr oup 2 compar ed wi t h t he model , I L- 6 concent r at i ons no si gni f i cant change, P 0. 05, anal ysi s of var i ance bet ween t he t wo gr oups st i l l can not bel i eve t hat t her e wer e si gni f i cant di ff er ences; exper i ment al gr oup and dr ug cont r ol gr oup and model gr oup 1, model 2 wer e compar ed, I L- 6 concent r at i ons wer e si gni f i cant l y l ower i n t he ɑ = 0. 05 under t he anal ysi s of var i ance t her e wer e si gni f i cant di ff er ences; exper i ment al gr oup and cont r ol gr oup and model gr oup 1, model 2 wer e compar ed by anal ysi s of var i ance, P 0. 05 was st at i st i cal l y si gni f i cant ; sal i ne cont r ol gr oup and model gr oup 1, gr oup 2 model compar ed, P 0. 05, st i l l can not bel i eve t hat no di ff er ence i n t he t wo sampl es; t heexper i ment al gr oup and cont r ol gr oup of dr ug concent r at i ons of I L- 6, P0. 05, Anal ysi s of var i ance st i l l can not bel i eve t hat t he t wo sampl es ar e si gni f i cant l y di ff er ent; t he exper i ment al gr oup compar ed