网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

全身麻醉患者苏醒时触摸心弦护理效果分析.docVIP

全身麻醉患者苏醒时触摸心弦护理效果分析.doc

  1. 1、本文档共11页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
全身麻醉患者苏醒时触摸心弦护理效果分析

全身麻醉患者苏醒时触摸心弦护理效果分析   [摘要] 目的 对全身麻醉患者苏醒时实施触摸心弦护理,探讨触摸心弦护理效果和患者满意度。 方法 研究纳入2014年1月~ 2015年1月在我院进行全身麻醉手术的500例患者,根据术后苏醒护理方式不同分为对照组和观察组,对照组(n=250)患者行全麻术后常规护理,观察组(n=250)在行常规护理的基础上运用马斯洛的需要论在全身麻醉患者苏醒时对其进行触摸心弦的护理,比较两组患者术后血压和心率、并发症发生率、住院日、满意率、健康教育的知晓率。 结果 两组患者麻醉苏醒时的收缩压、舒张压和心率与麻醉前无显著性差异,但观察组患者血压和心率较对照组患者显著降低(P0.05);观察组并发症发生率和住院时间显著低于对照组(P0.05),观察组患者满意率和健康教育知晓率高达100%,显著高于对照组(P0.05)。 结论 通过全身麻醉患者苏醒时触摸心弦的护理,不仅使患者术后血压和心率趋于平稳,更能减少并发症的发生,缩短住院时间,增加患者满意度,增进护患关系,促进患者早日康复。   [关键词] 全身麻醉;苏醒时;触摸心弦;护理   [中图分类号] R473.5 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 2095-0616(2015)24-124-03   [Abstract] Objective To explore the effect of touch heartstrings for nursing and patient satisfaction through used general touch heart care in anesthesia analepsia implementation. Methods Included in January 2014 to 2015 years January in our hospital general anesthesia and operation of 500 patients, according to the different postoperative recovery nursing divided into control group and observation group, control group (n=250) of patients undergoing general anesthesia postoperative routine nursing care, the observation group (n=250) received conventional nursing used Maslows need theory in the patients undergoing general anesthesia recovery to touch the hearts of nursing and were compared between the two groups of patients with postoperative blood pressure and heart rate, complications occurred rate, hospitalization days, satisfactory rate, health education awareness rate. Results The anesthesia recovery systolic pressure, diastolic pressure and heart rate before and after anesthesia of two groups was no significant difference, but the blood pressure and heart rate of observe group compared with the control group was decreased significantly (P0.05); the complication rate and hospitalization time of observation group were significantly lower than that of control group (P0.05), the satisfaction rate and health education, awareness rate of observation group were as high as 100%, which was significantly higher than that of the contro

文档评论(0)

317960162 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档