全程护理干预模式对雾化治疗哮喘患者生命体征及临床症状影响.docVIP

全程护理干预模式对雾化治疗哮喘患者生命体征及临床症状影响 　　【摘要】 目的 分析哮喘患者在接受雾化治疗时给予全程护理干预模式对患者生命体征以及临床症状的影响。方法 68例哮喘患者为研究对象， 随机分为研究组与对照组， 每组34例。所有患者均接受雾化治疗， 对照组患者给予常规性护理干预， 研究组患者给予全程护理干预。比较两组的护理效果。结果 护理前， 两组血氧饱和度、心率、呼吸频率、日间临床症状及夜间临床症状评分比较差异均无统计学意义（P0.05）；护理后， 研究组血氧饱和度、心率、呼吸频率、日间临床症状及夜间临床症状评分均优于对照组， 差异均具有统计学意义（P0.05）。研究组患者的护理满意度为97.06%， 高于对照组的76.47%， 差异具有统计学意义（P0.05）。结论 哮喘患者在接受雾化治疗时， 给予其全程护理干预， 能够有效的改善患者在接受治疗过程中的生命体征以及临床症状， 且在全程护理干预模式下， 哮喘患者对护理人员的护理工作满意程度也有所上升， 具有一定临床意义， 值得推广使用。 　　【关键词】 全程护理干预模式；雾化治疗；哮喘；生命体征；临床症状 　　DOI：10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2017.05.080 　　Influence of whole nursing intervention mode on vital signs and clinical symptoms of asthma patients with nebulizer therapy WANG Hui. Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region People’s Hospital， Hohhot 010010， China 　　【Abstract】 Objective To analyze the influence of whole nursing intervention mode on vital signs and clinical symptoms of asthma patients with nebulizer therapy. Methods A total of 68 asthma patients as study subjects were randomly divided into research group and control group， with 34 cases in each group. All patients received nebulizer therapy， and the control group received conventional nursing intervention. The research group received whole nursing intervention. Nursing effect was compared in two groups. Results Before nursing， both groups had no statistically significant difference in blood oxygen saturation， heart rate， respiratory rate， clinical symptoms scores in day and night （P0.05）. After nursing， the research group had better blood oxygen saturation， heart rate， respiratory rate， clinical symptoms scores in day and night than the control group， and their differences had statistical significance （P0.05）. The research group had nursing satisfaction degree as 97.06%， which was higher than 76.47% in the control group， and the difference had statistical significance （P0.05）. Conclusion During nebulizer therapy in asthma patients， whole nursing intervention can effectively improve the vital signs and clinical symptoms of pat