浅析中西医结合治疗糖尿病并发眼肌麻痹临床效果.docVIP

浅析中西医结合治疗糖尿病并发眼肌麻痹临床效果.doc

  1. 1、本文档共9页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
浅析中西医结合治疗糖尿病并发眼肌麻痹临床效果

浅析中西医结合治疗糖尿病并发眼肌麻痹临床效果   [摘要] 目的 对糖尿病并发眼肌麻痹患者使用中西结合治疗的临床效果进行研究分析。 方法 2011年9月―2013年8月该院对60例糖尿病并发眼肌麻痹患者进行研究分析,分成对照组和治疗组,均有30例,对照组患者使用基础治疗、维生素β1、腺苷钴胺注射治疗方式,治疗组在对照组基础上增加了针灸治疗,两组均接受了30 d治疗。对比分析两组的治疗效果和治疗前后的症状积分。 结果 经过治疗,对照组的治疗有效率是80.0%,治疗组的治疗有效率是96.7%,两组结果显示治疗组的疗效更加突出,结果差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。经过治疗两组的症状积分均有所下降,均比治疗前要低差异有统计学意义(P0.05),治疗组患者的积分比对照组降低幅度更大(P0.05)。 结论 临床中导致糖尿病合并眼肌麻痹的病因众多,中西结合治疗具有比较好的效果,能够改善患者的症状,对预后效果起到提升作用,临床中值得推广使用。   [关键词] 糖尿病;眼肌麻痹;针灸;临床症状   [中图分类号] R777.4 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1672-4062(2017)05(a)-0073-02   Analysis of Clinical Efficacy of Integrated TCM and Western Medicine in Treating Diabetes Combined with Ophthalmoplegia   LIU Wei, KONG Jing, PAN Xue, XIE Zhi-jian   Department of Internal Medicine, Harbin City Hospital of TCM, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, 150076 China   [Abstract] Objective This paper tries to investigate and analyze the clinical effects of integrated TCM and Western Medicine in treating diabetes combined with ophthalmoplegia. Methods 60 cases of patients with diabetes combined with ophthalmoplegia from September 2011 to August 2013 in this hospital were analyzed and divided into the control group and treatment group, with 30 cases in each group. The control group adopted basic treatment, vitamin β1, cobamamide injection treatment, and the treatment group added acupuncture treatment except for the above treatments, and 30 days of treatment were implemented. The treatment effects and symptom integration scores before and after treatment were compared between the two groups. Results The effective rate of the control group was 80.0% after treatment, and that of the treatment group was 96.7%, which showed that the curative effect of the treatment group was more prominent, and the result was statistically significant(P0.05). The symptom integration scores of both groups were decreased after treatment, which were lower than that before treatment the was statisticolly significant(P0.05), and the scores in the treatment group decreased more than

文档评论(0)

erterye + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档