- 1、本文档共10页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
瘢痕子宫再次妊娠选择阴式分娩的临床安全性分析
[摘要] 目的 研究瘢痕子宫再次妊娠选择阴式分娩的临床安全性分析。 方法 回顾性分析我院2014年6月~2015年2月进行再次分娩的瘢痕子宫产妇的临床资料,其中行经阴道试产成功分娩60例(实验组),将实验组(60例)与同期瘢痕子宫产妇行再次剖宫产68例(对照组A)和同期初产妇行经阴道分娩50例组(对照组B)进行比较,对比分析各组的术中情况、新生儿情况以及产妇并发症情况,观察其临床安全性。 结果 实验组的产时出血量、住院时间显著低于对照组A(P0.05);实验组的新生儿Apgar评分、新生儿窒息的发生率与对照组A和对照组B均无统计学差异(P0.05);实验组的并发症发生率与对照组B无显著差异(P0.05),但实验组的并发症发生率显著低于对照组A(P0.05)。 结论 掌握瘢痕子宫产妇阴道试产的禁忌证和适应证,瘢痕子宫再次行阴道分娩成功率较高,产时出血少,住院时间短,产后并发症少,优于再次剖宫产,是一种较为安全、经济、有效的分娩方式。
[关键词] 瘢痕子宫;妊娠;阴道分娩;安全性
[中图分类号] R714.3 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 2095-0616(2015)20-61-03
Analysis of clinical safety of vaginal delivery on subsequent pregnancy of scar uterus
ZHANG Bolan QIU Youzhi LIN Man
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Jiexi County Peoples Hospital, Jiexi 515400, China
[Abstract] Objective To study the analysis of clinical safety of vaginal delivery on subsequent pregnancy of scar uterus. Methods The clinical data of puerperant with scar uterus, who were delivery again in our hospital from June 2014 to February 2015, were retrospectively analyzed, thereinto, 60 cases were carried out vaginal delivery as experimental group, 68 cases were carried out repeated cesarean section as control group A, while 50 cases of primipara were carried out vaginal delivery control group B. To compare and comparative analyze the intraoperative situation, neonatal statuses, complication situation of puerperant, to observe the clinical safety. Results The intrapartum blood loss, the hospitalization time in experimental group were significantly lower than which in control group A, the differences were statically significant(P0.05), the neonatal Apgar score, the incidence of neonatal asphyxia of experimental group had no statically significant compared with control group A and control group B(P0.05), the complication rate of experimental group had no statically significant compared with control group B(P0.05). While the complication rate in experimental group was significantly lower than which in control group A,
文档评论(0)