TheRepricingGapModel:重新定价缺口模型.pdf

  1. 1、本文档共26页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
1 The Repricing Gap Model 1.1 INTRODUCTION Among the models for measuring and managing interest rate risk, the repricing gap is certainly the best known and most widely used. It is based on a relatively simple and intuitive consideration: a bank’s exposure to interest rate risk derives from the fact that interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities show differing sensitivities to changes in market rates. The repricing gap model can be considered an income-based model, in the sense that the L target variable used to calculate the effect of possible changes in market rates is, in fact, A an income variable: the net interest income (NII – the difference between interest income I and interest expenses). For this reason this model falls into the category of “earnings R approaches” to measuring interest rate risk. Income-based models contrast with equity- E based methods, the most common of which is the duration gap model (discussed in the following chapter). These latter models adopt the market value of the bank’s equity as T the target variable of possible immunization policies against interest rate risk. A After analyzing the concept of gap, this chapter introduces maturity-adjusted gaps, and explores the distinction between marginal and cumulative gaps, highlighting the difference M in meaning and various applications of the two risk measurements. The dis

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

annylsq + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档