国际融资中的抵销问题法律研究-国际法学专业论文.docxVIP

摘 摘 要 本文麸三令方瑟探讨了国际联资孛蕊羝镑法律阏题： 作为探讨国际融资中抵销法律问题的前提，第一章嚣先较全面地探讨了法 捧遥瘸闽越，氢揍终走分撰{l誊提敬识别超题；霹缝发生法簿{申突豹方露；正鬻 情况下抵销问题(包括涉及第三人)的法律适用原则，麓者倾向于适用基础债 投约准据法：初步建立了分辑破产抵镑法律适用阚题鲍一个分据框架与摸式； 探讨了适用于金融衍生工具轧差的法律；欧洲货币存款的法律适用：以及特别 是欧洲的糖关立法、条约与司法据助阉题。 相互性是在确定了适用法之聪考虑的问题，艇于这～问题在抵销中的重要 -胜，教单列一翥，主要探讨：涉及跨国公司及跨嗣银行时的相互性，关予揭开 公司面纱问题的备国实践：关于涉及政府机构时的相互性：国际银团贷款不同 形式下的相互性闽题。 我国的银行抵销权立法是相对落后的，许多基础观念尚未褥副转交。而相 关司法解释又参麓不齐，关键是银行抵销权的对抗力问题尚未与国际通行做法 一致，完善立法豁关键就在于应当明确锻行抵销毅可以对抗法院执行，以免镶 行降到低于其它无担保债权人的地位。丽冲突法的完善商待于明确合同准据法 斡适用范滔包括抵销问题，以及对破产祗锫法律遁雳傲凄相关蕊定。 【关键词】：抵销轧差冲突法刚际融资相互性 ABSTRACTThis ABSTRACT This thesis made three approaches to set-off of international financing： The first chapter dealt with the premise of set·off．application of governing law． Including：characterization，the very premise of analysis；the fields in which there might be conflicts；the general principle of choice of law in set—off(including situations involving interveners)，the author favors the law applicable to the primary claim；framed a paradigm in analyzing choice of proper law in insolvent set—off； discussed the law applicable to netting of derivatives；the law applicable to Eurocurrency deposits；and international legislation，treaties and international judicial assistance，especially that of Europe． Reciprocity is an important substantial element that could be dealt with only after the choice oflaw was settled．Here the author discussed the problems ofreciprocity in three levels：Reciprocity when Transnational Corporation and／or Transnational Bank were／was involved，the problem of piercing the corporate veil；Reciprocity when government institutions were involved；and Reciprocity in different forms of international syndicated loans． Because of immaturity in some fundamental legal concepts，set-off law of China is comparatively insufficient．The existing judicial interpretations were inconsistent， the CrnX is the efficacity of bank’S right of set—off was always denied by enforcement of the court，that is not in conformity with the prevalent pract