February 2004 2004年2月课件.ppt

Benefits of Full Suite Integratedvs. Multiple Product Combination“全系统集成”相对于“多产品组合”方式的优点Purchasing Phase采购阶段 Purchase and Licenses costs采购和许可费用 Accountability　责任与义务　 Customer usually is not facing the point product vendors 用户通常不直接面对每个产品的厂商 One (or more) products does not interfaces properly with network 单个（或者多个）产品不适于与网络接口 API of a product does not comply with others in the Suite 系统中某个产品的API与其他产品的API不一致 3rd Party Licenses Costs　第三方许可费用 Multiple use of 3rd party SW products (DB) 大量采用第三方软件产品（数据库） Need for Multiple/Different license agreement 需要多个、不同的许可协议 Additional CAPEX　额外的投资成本 Extended IP Infrastructure 扩展IP基础设施 EAI Bus – Additional licenses and HW EAI总线——额外的许可和硬件投入 Integration - Schedule and Cost集成－时间与成本 Integration Complexity　集成的复杂性 Inter-product APIs 产品间的API接口 Multiple interfaces to the Network 多个与网络的接口 Design and Implementation of extensive time period 周期时间长的设计与实施 Testing　测试 Involvement of teams from point products vendors – coordination 协调来自不同产品厂商的开发队伍 Consecutive testing – Customer project team is occupied 联合测试——需要客户的项目团队参与 Solution Expansion　方案扩展 Adding new functionality-engineering and testing with all point products 增加新的功能——工程问题、与所有产品的测试问题 Introduction of new NE or EM type – involving all products 接入新网元或者网元管理系统类型——影响所有的产品 Introduction of new technology in the service provider’s network 引入新技术到服务提供商的网络中 Benefits of Fully Integrated Solution“全系统集成”方案的优点 No integration needed for Fully Integrated Suite 对于“全系统集成”的系统，没有集成的必要 ONE tool, faster implementation and customization 一个工具，可以快速地实施和客制化 One tool for many purposes Re-use: 一个工具，多种用途复用： Mediation Thresholds – same for Fault, Performance, Traffic etc. 采集层门限设置方式——对于故障、性能、话务等都相同 One Scheduler 单一调度 One Dispatcher 单一分发 One Web-Reporter.. 一个基于Web的报表系统 Benefits of Full Suite Integratedvs. Multiple Product Combination“全系统集成”相对于“多产品组合”方式的优点Ongoing Operation实际运行阶段 Unified Mediation统一的采集层 Unified mediation layer for all TOM/FCAPS functions 统一的采集层，针对所有的TOM/FCAPS功能 Reduced NE polling 减少对网元的轮询 See the big p