论无权处分-法律专业论文.docxVIP

内容撼要茏权处分一直怒个常觅丽又复杂的琵法现象，驮来就有“渡学上的精灵”之美称。 内容撼要 茏权处分一直怒个常觅丽又复杂的琵法现象，驮来就有“渡学上的精灵”之美称。 而谢熟无权处分的比较完善的法律理跄和制度则肇始于19峨纪初的德因历史法学派棚 当时德国民法典。自从该学派创始人萨维尼提出物权行为理论并以之作为解决无权处分 问题姻理沦綦鹞起，监界上逐步，眵成了璎沧特您鲜fl}_l、您决方法嚣努救三鼬矬淀主张毋l 立法例。近年来随着蛔际交往的4j断深入，不同的兀权处分法律理沦和制度之例的融合 F|蘸}1舅鑫，在瑟背景一F，。瞵蒡厶多年貔我蕊无投处分剁度终予弧冁豁缝。但《合溺法》第 5l条出台至今，各种纷争 直不绝于工_|=。为完善这项重要的法{=}!制度，本文运川比较 秘历史两种研究方法对无权处分及稠笑的理论主张和立法例作了认真的饼翔，并舀：此。i恙 础上笔者根据债权形式主义基础删沦，绦合《民法通则》、《合同法》和《物极泼孳案建 c义稿》的基本内容年订立法倾向作了适当的优化设计，并考量悃关制皮之M￡j洽性问题肼， 提出了我l：《无投处分捌度完善之镪羟。 【关键词】无权处分比较研究历史研究完善路径 Absn·actUntitled Absn·act Untitled disposilion is a familiar but complicated coneept of eivil la、v，；t was given a ∞pu论￡；on as THE SPlRlT oF L嚣(jA乙STDY 1氇e pfimal consumma{e le蒜al lheo叮and system which regulated the untitled disposition was embryonic fornl thc Dutch hist()ric Jaw school in the 1 9m cenlu“and exist in the Dutch civiI code of lhe time．From lhe limc whcn S鑫Vi基鞋y lhe fb珏ndef of ib。se熟ool、V巍。pfo|)ose娃tbe}廷e。fy of p∞perly嚣e}ion疰芒11t an娃 took it as lhe foundation to s01Ve the untit{ed d’sposition，there are three distinct bul dijl己rcll【 academic proposition and legislation appeared． Going with the inteIⅥationaI dcali『1苎 靠eqnently，the Various ac蠢emie theo r主es and systelHs of untilled d{spositi。n af#increasin苎ly coming into amalgan，ation obViousb^Under the background，the“nti{led disposilion systcnl which had been pregnant for seVeral years cventuaIly gave to bir￡11．人s we have secll．sincc the articl5 l of the ciVil code enacted，the wrangles came into 10rth one aner anothcL‘fb pef受cl{甄e蠢n；)ona毽t logal syste赫，{he a娃iele stt瓣ied the u轴{i￡led鑫isp(}sition a}{d releva{1t propositions and Iegislations by comparative method and histo“c nlethod，bascd on t11af Ihc writer propose a suitable optimize contriVe combined with thc c心diIor’s right Pha“saism and tbe CiVil code，C。ntract law and prope旺y“ght su錾gestion dra蟪，b。sides lhat et)nsidere(1 111c auton{)mic matters of『eieVan{systems，pfoposed the∞uie on{10w lo per{＆￡t}1e ujltilloti disposition system in China law 【Key wo