论辩护人、诉讼代理人毁灭证据、伪造证据、妨害作证罪-法律专业论文.docxVIP

摘要文章从介缓刑法对第三酉零六条的法条规定开始，说明了该法 摘要 文章从介缓刑法对第三酉零六条的法条规定开始，说明了该法 条立法的由来和该法条罪名的确定。辩护人、诉讼代理人毁灭诞据、 稳途证据、妨密终汪嚣侵狻的客髂是复杂客俸，它既干撬了蠲法橇 关正常的刑事诉讼活动，又破坏了我瀚的刑事辩护制度；在客观方 面袭现为在刑攀诉讼中实施了妨害证据的幸亍为；主体是自然人特殊 主体，即只有粼事案释的辩护入、诉讼健瑾人才鸯毪秘残本罪；主疆 方灏只能由直接敌意构成。该罪存在獬罪的未遂形态。刑法第三百 零六条对该罪规定了两个基刑幅度。文章从立法理念、法条规定、 司法实践等三个方匿分析了该法条的立法缺陷。文章认为，要妥善 解决该法条存在的立法缺陷，不仅要从聪事实体法熊度对刑法第三 百零六条进行立法完善，而且要从刑事程序法的角度进行一些相应 的保障性的规定。从实体法的熊度来鬻，首先，劂刑法修正寨对该 法条传赛立法瞧麓限裁，其次，翅司法熊释对该法条中酶“威胁”、 “弓l诱”、“情节严重”等词作出规范。从程序法的角度来看，首先， 将律师惩戒程序作为追究本罪的刑事赞任的前置程序；其次，设置 一些包括回避程序在内的特别程序；褥次，明确簿鼎的剩事责任熬 免艨煲|j；最后，设立证据开示制度。 关键锈：辩护入、诉讼代理入羧灭证据、伪遣证据、妨害作证 罪刑法第三酉零六条立法缺陷立法宪善 AbstractThis Abstract This article introduces the art．306 of the criminallaw at first．then explain the origin ofthe legislation and the determination ofthe accusal of it．The object of the crime is complex．which disturbs the criminal procedure ofthe judicial departments and destroys OUr defending system； in the impersonal aspect，the offender does harm to give evidence in the criminal lawsuit；the subject of the crime should be special natural person who are the defenders or legal representatives；the subjective aRitude is direct intention．The subjective respect of it Can be not accomplished．The art．306 prescribes tow kinds of the extent for measure of criminal punishment．ne article give a complete analyze to this crime from legal principle，the art．regulate，judicial practice．I think we should establish some indemnificatory regulate in substantive and procedural law to fetch up the legislation defects．From the substantive law angle，the legislature should amend the criminal law to restrict the field ofthe crime at first．Then the critical judicial explanation should be regulated to normalize the intangible concepts．From the procedural law angle，I consider the lawyer punishment machanism as the prepositive procedure in investigating the criminal responsibility．I think it is necessary to regulate some special system including the obviation procedure．It is also necessary to determinate the criminal