系统功能语言学视角下的翻译研究.ppt

“A formal correspondent, on the other hand, is any TL category (unit, class, structure, element of structure, etc.) which can be said to occupy, as nearly as possible, the ‘same’ place in the ‘economy’ of the TL as the given SL category occupies in the SL.” 穆雷. 评卡特福德的《翻译的语言学理论》[J] 《外语教学》1990 (2):37 林克难. 重新认识卡特福德翻译理论 [J] 《天津外国语学院学报》 2001(1) 刘文华 梁燕.卡特福德翻译等值论中的翻译的转移及对语言教学的启示 [J] 《鞍山师范学院学报》 2004(3) 范祥涛. 从卡特福德到翻译规律的探讨 --兼论语料库翻译研究的意义[J] 《外语研究》 2006（2） 孙乃荣 王秀娟.《语言学翻译理论》评介[J].《安徽工业大学学报》 2006（6）  4.2 Approach by Hatim Mason Hatim Mason (1990) takes a functional discourse approach Register analysis Discourse structure Texture Text type Context Intertextuality and intentionality 4.3 Bell’s approach Bell (1991) focuses on elements in communication What? Why? When? How? Where? Who? 4.4 Baker’s approach Baker (1992) focuses on “equivalence”: Equivalence at word level Equivalence above word level Grammatical equivalence Textual equivalence Pragmatic equivalence 5 SFL approach revisited Revisiting the Systemic Functional Linguistics approach to translation studies 5.1 Basic assumptions A translated text is different from the original text in terms of context of co-text, context of situation and context of culture. A functional linguistics approach to the analysis of a translated text is a functional linguistics study of the text and its context. 5.2 A functional view of language Language as meaning-potential Choices of language are meaningful in relation to the system of choices available (what could have been said but was not) Language as metafunctional Ideational Interpersonal Textual Language as multi-stratal (Discourse) Semantics Lexicogrammar Phonology / Graphology The traffic light system Stop Slow down RED Go AMBER GREEN Meaning (is realized by) Form Language as meaning-potential He is my father/dad. 父亲。 他是我 爸爸。 老窦。 Meaning as metafunctiona