- 1、本文档共6页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
标题: The Interpretive Camera in Documentary Films
作者: Willard van Dyke Reviewed work(s):
来源: Hollywood Quarterly, Vol. 1, No. 4 (Jul., 1946), pp. 405-409
出版商: University of California Press
出处: /stabie7T2Q9501
引文格式: van Dyke, Willard. The Interpretive Camera in Documentary Films.Hollywood Quarterly 1.4 (1946): 405-409.
The Interpretive Camera in
Documentary Films
WILLARD VAN DYKE
WILLARD VAN DYKE began his career in documentary films as a cameraman on The River. He was co-producer ofThe City, and director of Valley Town, The Bridge, Northwest, U.S.A., and San Francisco, 1945. During the war hewas a producer for the O.W.I. Overseas Motion Picture Bureau.
T EN YEARS AGO a new era in documentary film making began in the United States. In 1936 PareLorentz finished his film The Plow That Broke the Plains and the critics without exceptionremarked upon its extraordinary photography. The following year The River was released andagain scarcely a review failed to stress the beauty of the camera work. When The City camealong in 1939, the critics praise of documentary film photography reached a new high.
Documentary films-and here we are concerned with the true documentary as defined byPhilip Dunne in issue Number 2 of the Hollywood Quarterly-have always been notable for thequality of their photography. The reasons for this fact have not always been clear to the critics,and it is the purpose of this article to examine some of the aspects of a craft which is muchdiscussed and little understood.
Many of the best documentary cameramen were still photographers who left that mediumbecause they felt it was too limiting a vehicle to carry complex ideas. Ralph Steiner, Paul Strand,and Leo Hurwitz had all been well- known still photographers, but their cinematography forThe Plow showed clearly their ability to expand their craft to encompass a broader field.
Roger Barlow, whose camera work on many documentaries is outstanding, came to movieswith a fine collection of sti
文档评论(0)