纺织服装外文翻译文献.doc

　　外文文献翻译完整版 译文3200多字 　　(含：英文原文及中文译文) 　　文献出处： Kar F, Fan J, Yu W. Comparison of different test methods forthe measurement of fabric or garment moisture transfer properties[J].　Measurement Science Technology, 2007, 18(7):2033. 　　英文原文 Comparison of different test methods for the measurement of fabric orgarment moisture transfer properties F Kar, J Fan and W Yu Abstract 　　Several test methods exist for determining the water vapourpermeability or resistance of textile fabrics or garments. The differencesand interrelationships between these methods are not always clear, whichpresents a problem in comparing results from different test methods. Thisstudy is aimed at investigating the relationships between the test resultsfrom four typical test methods, including the moisture transmission test(Model CS-141), ASTM E96 cup method, sweating guarded hot platemethod (ISO11092) and the sweating fabric manikin (Walter). For therange of air permeable knitted fabrics tested, it was found that goodinterrelationships exist between the results from the four types of test methods, although some discrepancies exist between different tests due todifferences in testing conditions. Test results from different moisturetransfer test methods can therefore be convertible with due consideration. 　　Keywords: fabric, water vapour transmission rate, clothing comfort, watervapour resistance 　　1. Introduction 　　Moisture transfer properties of textile fabrics and garments areimportant to the thermal comfort of clothed persons. A number of testmethods have been developed to evaluate the moisture transfer propertiesof textile fabrics and garments. However, since the techniques and testingconditions of these tests are very different, results from these tests are notdirectly comparable. It is therefore necessary to investigate thedifferences and interrelationships between the results from these differenttest methods. 　　Dolhan compared two Canadian Standards (CAN2-4.2-M77 andCAN/CGSB-4.2 No. 49-M91) and t