论行政相对人不履行行政协议的司法救济.pdfVIP

摘要 摘 要 行政协议作为一种柔性的行政管理手段，在世界各国被广泛应用。由于行政协议是 行政主体与相对人之间约定的协议，协议双方都有违反约定不执行协议的可能，同时行 政诉讼具有民告官特性，在行政相对人一方违约的情况下，行政诉讼法并未明确规定守 约方如何救济，直到2019年 《最高人民法院关于审理行政协议案件若干问题的规定》 规定行政机关只能通过非诉执行的方式去解决。非诉执行的制度设计主要围绕一般行政 行为，即主要针对的是行政行为的行政性，这对于行政协议的非诉执行是并不完全适用 的。因此探索行之有效的行政相对人违约救济制度显得非常必要。通过对学界的观点进 行分析和整理，同时分析德国和英国的行政相对人不履行行政协议的救济制度，认为我 国应吸收德国的双向诉讼构造以及英国诉讼之外的协商、调解制度的经验。构建 “反向 诉讼”制度给行政机关以司法救济，同时在反向诉讼或行政协议司法审查中建立调解制 度以更有效的解决行政协议纠纷。 关键词：行政协议；行政诉讼法；行政相对人； “反向诉讼” -I- 哈尔滨商业大学硕士学位论文 Abstract As a flexible administrative management method, administrative agreement is widely used in various countries around the world. Because the administrative agreement is an agreement between the administrative subject and the counterparty, both parties to the agreement may violate the agreement and fail to execute the agreement. At the same time, administrative litigation has the characteristics of a public prosecutor. It is not clear how the compliance party will provide relief. Until the Peoples Court of the Peoples Republic of China Provisions on Several Issues in the Trial ofAdministrativeAgreement Cases stipulated that administrative organs could only solve it through non-action enforcement, and the design ofthenon-action enforcement system wasmainly designed around general administrationActs, that is, the administrative nature of administrative acts, are not completely applicable to the non-action enforcement of administrative agreements.Therefore,it isvery necessary to explore the effective administrative counterparty breach of contract relief system. By sorting out and analyzing the viewpoints of the academic circles, and drawing on the relief system of non- performance of administrative agreements by foreign administrative counterparts, we believe that China should