破产程序中撤销权制度研究.pdf

摘要 摘 要 法律的核心价值即公平和正义，在破产程序中，债务人对债权人的清偿更应体现出 公平的价值取向。但是，企业在出现破产原因并不能清偿全部债务时，无论债务人还是 债权人可能会为了自身的利益而做出规避法律的行为。为确保债权人可以公平的受偿， 则需要行使破产撤销权，其目的是撤销债务人不当的清偿行为，从而使财产恢复之前的 状态，保障其他债权人能够公平的分配。我国的企业破产法研究起步较晚，立法规定还 不够成熟，破产撤销权仍存在不足。因此，立足于我国的司法实践，亟需借鉴他国先进 制度，不断丰富和完善我国的破产撤销权制度。 首先，通过案例，分析法官的判决地依据，梳理出争议焦点。从而引出破产撤销权 在司法实践中所存在的问题。其次，从破产撤销权的基础理论入手，对破产撤销权的基 本概念进行了界定，阐述了破产撤销权的历史演进，剖析了民法上撤销权和破产撤销权 之间的关系，探讨了破产撤销权的两种行为类型，对破产撤销权的构成要件进行展开。 再次，分析了我国破产撤销权行使存在的主要问题，一是主观恶意应否成为破产撤销权 的主观要件、二是偏颇性清偿范围过于狭窄、三是破产管理人怠于行使破产撤销权、四 是破产重整中债务人可否行使破产撤销权。最后，提出了完善我国破产撤销权制度的建 议，一是明确破产撤销权行使的主观要件、二是扩大偏颇性清偿例外的范围、三是健全 管理人的激励制度、四是明确破产重整中债务人的破产撤销权。 关键词 破产撤销权；偏颇性清偿行为；欺诈性转让行为 - -I 哈尔滨商业大学硕士学位论文 Abstract The core value of law is fairness and justice. In the bankruptcy procedure, the debtors payment to the creditor should reflect the fair value orientation.However,when the enterprise fails to pay off all its debts due to bankruptcy, either the debtor or the creditor may evade the law for their own interests.For the sake of ensure that the creditor can receive compensation , it must be exercised the right of bankruptcy cancellation, which aims to cancel the debtors improper repayment, so as to restore the property to its previous state and guarantee the fair distribution of other creditors.The study ofthe enterprise bankruptcy law in China started late, the legislative provisions are not mature enough, and the bankruptcy revocation right is still insufficient. Therefore, based on Chinas judicial practice, it is urgent to learn from the advanced system of other countries, and constantly enrich and improve Chinas system of bankruptcy cancellationright. First, through the case analysis of thejudgesjudgment basis, combing out the focus of controversy. Thus leads to the bankruptcy revo