捕诉合一办案模式的实证研究——以J省检察机关适用为样本.pdfVIP

摘 要 在司法改革的大背景下，司法责任制改革、以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革、 检察官员额制改革、国家监察体制改革使检察机关面临严峻的考验，同时也带来 新的机遇，捕诉合一办案模式系推进司法改革的重要配套措施。刑事诉讼法学界 就“捕诉合一还是捕诉分离”曾展开激烈辩论，争论的焦点大多停留在理论探讨 和逻辑推演层面，对改革之后的捕诉实践现状还分析不多。2018年9月，J省检 察机关在全省推行捕诉合一办案模式，经过一年多时间的运行，当初关于捕诉合 一的某些争议在实证数据分析中也有所体现，而捕诉合一所希冀达到的成效并不 突出，随着新诉讼机制的施行，也出现了一些新情况、新问题。本文以J省检察 机关适用捕诉合一办案模式后的逮捕情况、起诉情况、诉讼监督情况、认罪认罚 基本情况为分析样本，剖析J省检察机关在应对捕诉合一改革中存在办案质效未 见明显提升、配套机制不完善、检察人员的业务素质还不完全适应捕诉合一要求 等问题，并提出了妥善解决相关问题的针对性建议。 关键词：捕诉合一 ；检察改革； 检察制度 I Abstract Under the background of judicial reform, the reform of judicial responsibility system, the reform ofjudication-centered litigation system, the reform of procurator post system and the reform of national supervision system make procuratorial organs face severetests,while itbringsnew opportunities.Integration ofArrestApproval and Public Prosecution is an important supporting measure to promotejudicial reform. In the field of criminal procedure law,there has been a heated debate on integration of arrest approval and public prosecution or separation of arrest approval and public prosecution. However, the focus of the debate mainly stays in the theoretical discussion and logical deduction level, and there is no sufficient analysis of the current situation after integration ofarrest approval andpublicprosecution. In September 2018, the procuratorial Authority in J province implemented integration of arrest approval and public prosecution to handle cases in the whole province. Some of the original controversies about the integration of arrest approval andpublicprosecution are alsoreflected in the empirical data analysisafter morethan one year of operation. However, the expected effect of the integration of arrest approval and public prosecution is not outstanding. With the implementation of the new litigation mechanism, some new situations and problems have