爱不变乖乖（浅析入户抢劫）初稿.docVIP

PAGE 1 目录 TOC \o 1-3 \h \z \u 摘要 1 前言 2 一、入户抢劫的概念及构成特征 3 （一）入户抢劫的概念 3 （二）入户抢劫的构成特征 3 （三）入户抢劫的立法原意 4 二、入户抢劫的加重构成要件 5 （一）入户抢劫加重构成要件的客体 5 （二）入户抢劫加重构成要件的客观方面 5 （三）入户抢劫加重构成要件的主观方面 5 三、“户”的司法认定 5 （一）“户”的含义 5 （二）“户”的法律构成特征 6 四、“入户抢劫”的认定问题 6 （一）入户之前的“犯意”是否必须 6 （二）关于违法入户和合法入户的问题 7 （三）“入户”与“在户”对认定入户抢劫的影响 7 （四）转化型入户抢劫的相关问题 8 （五）劫取财物场所的变化对认定入户抢劫的影响 8 五、入户抢劫的法定刑及立法完善 9 （一）入户抢劫的法定刑 9 （二）入户抢劫的立法完善 9 结束语 10 注释 10 参考文献 10 浅析入户抢劫 摘要：抢劫罪侵犯的客体是双重的，既侵犯了公私所有权，又侵犯了被害人的人身权利，往往会造成人身伤害，因而一直是我国刑法重点打击的犯罪之一。而入户抢劫具有更大的危害性，居民住宅关系到每个公民的人身安全和财产安全，受到宪法、刑法等法律的特别保护。入户抢劫不仅侵犯了公民的财产权和人身权，还同时侵犯了公民日常生活的隐私权。这也是立法加重对入户抢劫犯罪的惩罚力度的原因之一。本文试图以刑法典分则对入户抢劫的规定为基础，以入户抢劫的司法解释为参照物，从加重构成犯等刑法基本理论出发，分入户抢劫的基本理论、入户抢劫的司法认定和入户抢劫的法定刑及立法建议三大部分来系统地、全面地剖析入户抢劫。本文最后针对现行刑法对入户抢劫的法定加重刑期——10年以上有期徒刑至死刑这一量刑单元提出质疑。通过分析我国现行刑法的各种配刑模式的合理性问题，认为现行刑法将入户抢劫的法定刑起刑点规定过高，应当采用交叉加重模式。最后，提出了入户抢劫的立法建议：入户抢劫应处7年以上有期徒刑。 关键词：入户抢劫；加重构成犯；司法认定；法定刑 Abstract：The object violated by the crime of robbery is double, is a violation of the public and private ownership, and violated the rights of the person, often resulting in personal injury, which has been Chinas criminal law is one of the important crime. While the burglary is more harmful, residential relationship to each citizens security of person and property, under the constitution, criminal law, legal protection. Burglary not only encroached upon the citizens property right and personal right, but also violated the privacy of citizens daily lives. It is also aggravated burglary crime legislation of punishment is one of the reasons. This article attempts to criminal law of burglary based on regulations, judicial interpretations to rob into the door frame, the aggravated crime of criminal law such as basic theory, basic theory, divided burglary burglary and housebreaking judicial determination of legal punishment and legislation suggestion three most systematic, comprehensive analysis burglary. According to the current criminal law to le