英语课prezentation_group2拟定最终.pptVIP

;;One’s thought;;women should be gentle and feminine and nobody should be weak;;National Instrumentality and National Differences in MGRS;The BSRI is based on a conceptualization of the traditionally sex-typed person;Several theories summarized (Davidson-Katz 1991);To counteract the potential tendency of respondents to overreport good or under-report bad behavior, which could interfere with the interpretation of average tendencies on MGRS and BSRI, the part played by cross-national differences in Lie-Social Desirability responses on the outcome of hypoth-esis testing was also addressed; Procedure and matetials;; Participants;anonymous no financial incentives translated into each of the different native and dominant languages standardized response formats and scoring systems measures in same order;;;10 items（selected from the original BSRI＊）;24-item version＊ ;14 work goals;3 items;MGRS s-BSRI EPQR-A Lie Subscale ;Results and Analyses;Table 1. Survey of National Scores on Hofstede’s Masculinity (MAS) and Uncertainty Avoidance Index (UAI), and Masculine Gender Role Stress (MGRS), Bem’s Instrumentality and Lie Scales;;Table 2. Intercorrelations Between the Hofstede Dimensions (MAS and UAI) and Adjusted Masculine Gender Role Stress (MGRS), Bem’s Instrumentality and Lie Scale Scores.;Conclusion;Table 3. Summary of Hierarchical Regression Analysis of Masculine Gender Role Stress (MGRS) Scores on Bem’s Instrumentality and Hofstede’s Masculinity (MAS) Scores (n = 13 Countries).;Discussion and evaluation ;Part3. Application values;Part1. Discussion;★ In line with the individual level masculinity hypothesis, higher levels of country-level instrumentality predicted, independent of MAS scores, lower country levels of MGRS.;Part2. Limitation;▲The national samples used were not randomly drawn from the total sample of nations in the world.;Part3. Application values;● The present findings show that the tougher the society, the greater the likelihood that the average man will ex