论我国民事诉讼中的律师调查令.pdf

摘 要 律师调查令作为一种规范性法律文书在保障当事人调查取证权利、实现公正裁 判，促进司法效率方面具有重要作用，自 1998 年上海法院试点以来，对相关制 度已有近 20 年的探索，在实践中，律师调查令虽已取得了丰厚的成果，但由于 缺少统一的立法规范，在适用中暴露出了法律地位不明确、操作不规范、各地 区不统一等问题，本文通过探究律师调查令的产生的背景及确立基础，分析各 地试点的现状，借鉴两大法系文书提出命令和证据开示制度的探索，针对上述 暴露的问题，为我国律师调查令制度的完善提出合理化建议。 关键词：律师调查令；调查取证权；文书提出命令；证据开示 Abstract The lawyer investigation order, as a normative legal instrument, plays an important role in guaranteeing the rights of the parties to investigate and obtaining evidence, to realize the fair referee and to promote the efficiency of the judicature. Since the trial of the Shanghai court in 1998, the relevant system has been explored for nearly 20 years. In practice, although the lawyers regulation has made rich achievements, Due to the lack of unified legislative norms, in the application, the legal status is not clear, the operation is not standardized, and the various regions are not unified. This article explores the background and foundation of the emergence of the lawyer investigation order, analyzes the status of the pilot in various parts of the country, and draws on the exploration of the order and evidence opening system of the two legal systems. In view of the above exposed problems, we put forward rationalization proposals for the improvement of the lawyers investigation order system in China. Keywords: A lawyers investigation order; the right to investigate and collect evidence; a document to make an order; evidence to show 目 录 摘 要 I Abstract II 目 录 III 第 1 章 绪 论 1 1.1 课题研究背景及意义 1 1.1.1 课题研究背景 1 1.1.2 课题研究意义 2 1.2 课题的国内外研究现状 2 1.2.1 国内研究现状 2 1.2.2 国外研究现状 3 1.3 课题来源与研究的基本思路方法 3 1.3.1 研究的基本思路 3 1.3.2 研究的基本方法 4 第 2 章 我国民事诉讼律师调查令概述 5 2.1 我国民事诉讼律师调查令的概念与特点 5 2.1.1 律师调查令的概念 5 2.1.2 我国律师调查令的特点 5 2.2 我国民事诉讼律师调查令的确立基础 5 第 3 章 我国律师调查令的现状与困境 7 3.1 我国有关律师调查取证权的立法规定 7 3.2 我国律师调查令制度的试点现状 7 3.2.1 主要试点城市的措施 7 3.2.2 主要试点城市的特点及经验总结 8 3.3 我国律师调查令制度面临的困境 9 3.3.1 律师调查令法律地位规定不明 9 3.3.2 缺少统一的法律适用规范 10 3.3.3 缺少统一的文书适用格式 10 3.3.4 缺少权利的监督和救济机制