论我国的非法证据排除规则.pdf

本科生毕业论文（设计） 题 目： 论我国的非法证据排除规则 论我国的非法证据排除规则 [摘要]在刑事证据的相关理论当中，非法证据排除一直以来都存在很大的争议，由于 这种规则是对人权保障和犯罪惩罚这两种刑事诉讼的最大目标之间进行协调和冲突的过 程，对于应该优先考虑人权保障还是犯罪惩罚，国内刑事诉讼的实践和理论研究一直以来 都面临着两难的抉择。英美等发达国家在长期实践过程中，已经建立一个较为完善和成熟 的非法证据排除体系，这些国家的刑事诉讼实践过程中大量应用这种规则，其作用十分显 著。虽然国内现在已经将非法证据排除在形式诉讼当中进行建立，但是这种规则的配套制 度尚不完善，并且还存在操作性不强、界定不明确、位阶较低的特点。此次研究过程中主 要借助对非法证据的相关理论进行分析和研究，根据我国颁布的必威体育精装版刑事诉讼法和相关解 释和条款进行论述，并结合我国实际应用非法证据排除的具体情况，实现对国内刑事诉讼 相关内容和程序的展望，以求达到完善立法、规范司法实践的目的。 [关键词] 排除程序 刑讯逼供 非法证据 Exclusionary rule of illegal evidence in China [Abstract]One of the most controversial rules and contents in the field of evidence rules is the exclusionary rule of illegal evidence.，the main reason is that it embodies the criminal procedure to punish the crime.and protecting human rights conflict between the two value objectives and coordination， is the traditional goal of compliance to punish crime and protect human rights or that modern standard， and is always troubled countries criminal lawsuit theory and practice of a problem. After long-term practice， the United States， Britain and other countries have established relatively mature rules for the exclusion of illegal evidence and played an important role in litigation. At present， the rules for the elimination of criminal illegal evidence in China have been preliminarily established， but there are defects such as low level of legislation， unclear definition， weak operability and imperfect supporting system. This article makes every effort through to the illegal evidence exclusion rules of theoretical basis is analyzed， The newly revised criminal procedure law and the basis point of the relevant judicial interpretation， combined with the development of rules of excluding illegal evidence in our count