商法案例英文版全套教学课件汇总.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共216页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Zeran v. America Online, Incorporated Case Study Questions: What differentiates an online publisher from an online distributor? What liabilities do they bear respectively? Should an interactive computer service provider be held liable for privacy infringement defamation by a third party? Section II Privacy Virtual Property Rights Li Hongchen v. Beijing Arctic Ice Technology Development Co. Ltd. Virtual Property Case Study Questions: What is virtual property? How is virtual property different from other private properties? Who’s the owner of a virtual property in a MMORPG? The game operator, the game developer or the users? Is virtual property similarly protected by law as other private properties? Li Hongchen v. Beijing Arctic Ice Technology Development Co. Ltd. This case is generally regarded as the first instance of ‘virtual theft’ being recognized by a court. Visit the website /public/detail.php?id=143455, read the court’s detailed ruling of this case in Chinese and find out the court’s reasoning that virtual property is entitled to protection under the law. Li Hongchen v. Beijing Arctic Ice Technology Development Co. Ltd. Questions for Discussion 1 Do you agree with the court’s statement that virtual property is a kind of intangible property? If yes, how is virtual property different from other intangible properties? Li Hongchen v. Beijing Arctic Ice Technology Development Co. Ltd. Questions for Discussion 2 Beijing Arctic Ice Technology Development Co. Ltd. claims that virtual properties are just piles of data that does not assume physical existence and should not be recognized as private properties. Do you agree with that? State your reasons. Michael A. Smyth v. The Pillsbury Company Privacy Case Study Questions: What is privacy? Does an employee have privacy at work? What privacies are identified and protected by law? Is email communication private matter even if it’s done during work time and over a company intranet? Michael A. Smyth v. The Pill

文档评论(0)

BLUED + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

教师资格证持证人

全网 内容最全课件 价格最低 质量最高 不是之一,是唯一。 每个人使用的办公软件版本不一样,如有个别显示不出的文件,建议使用必威体育精装版版。

版权声明书
用户编号:8070063100000015
领域认证该用户于2023年03月20日上传了教师资格证

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档