2021年7月10日雅思考试机经·写作.docxVIP

大作文： Education of young people is highly prioritized in many countries. However, educating adults who cannot write or read is even more important and governments should spend more money on this. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 类型：agree or disagree 观点同意 大纲： 同意应该更重视扫除成年文盲 主体段1：扫除成年文盲的好处：1. 见效快；2. 对成年人帮助大；3. 对国家经济有益。 主体段2：与教育青少年的对比：1. 花钱少；2. 保证国家当前发展；3.提升当代人意识，为下一代教育打下基础。 Education is generally considered to be the source power of a countrys development, but it usually costs decades to take its powerful effects when its primary subjects are from younger generation. Therefore, some propose that the eradication of illiteracy among adults are more significant and should draw more investments from government. The benefits of eliminating illiteracy in the national context are immediate and eminent. Although illiterate working adults are normally occupied with daily working and hardly have spare time for learning, compulsory education teaching how to write and read may take only a couple of years night and weekend leisure time, instantly helping individuals acquire skills and earn more wages. Moreover, the greater proportion of literate population improves the quality of labor forces, indicating workers can deal with more intricate matters, by which government can attract more foreign investments in industries of technological nature. This input in one subject in few years repays the authorities and individuals in a very short term. On general occasions, those governors often need to consider a practical situation - the limited budget. For countries with a considerable number of people unable to read and write, they are mostly still under-developed and it means policies can only lean on either side, the children or the adults. However, the aforementioned benefits indicate a quicker and more efficient reward on public education naturally gains more favor from both policy makers and citizens although it is apparent that education on children is all-round, substantial