关于动物解剖的争论雅思作文.docxVIP

关于动物解剖的争论雅思作文 科学家在进行科学研究的时候会用到各种各样的动物，最常见的就是小白鼠。医生在练习解剖的时候也可能会用到兔子、猪等。虽然它们为科学事业的发展做出了很大的贡献，但是动物本身也承受了巨大的痛苦。因此，一些动物保护者认为应该停止动物实验，寻找替代的方案。那么我们在这种对立观点中可以采取怎样的立场呢? 雅思写作大作文题目： Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer,while others are in favor of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 现在，动物实验被广泛用于开发新的药品并且测试其他产品的安全性。一些人认为这些实验应该被禁止，因为给动物带来痛苦从道德上来讲是错误的。而其他人的支持它们，因为它们对人类有益。讨论双方观点，并给出你自己的意见。 雅思写作大作文范文： It is true that medicines and other products are routinely tested on animals before they are cleared for human use. While I tend towards the viewpoint that animal testing is morally wrong, I would have to support a limited amount of animal experimentation for the development of medicines. 事实如此，在药品和其他产品可以被人类安全使用之前，经常在动物身上做测试。虽然我倾向于这一观点，即动物测试在道德上是错误的，但我不得不之处一定量的为医学发展而进行的动物实验 On the one hand, there are clear ethical arguments against animal experimentation.To use a common example of this practice, laboratory mice may be given an illness so that the effectiveness of a new drug can be measured.Opponents of such research argue that humans have no right to subject animals to this kind of trauma and that the lives of all creatures should be respected.They believe that the benefits to humans do not justify the suffering caused and that scientists should use alternative methods of research. 一方面，从道德上来讲，有明确的原因反对动物实验。举一个很常见的实践例子，实验室的小白鼠经常被有意染上疾病，以便我们可以测试一种新药的有效性。这种研究的反对者认为人类没有权利让动物遭受这种痛苦，所有生物的生命都应该得到尊重。他们认为给人类带来的好处不能够为因此所造成的痛苦提供正当性，而科学家应该使用其他替代方式进行研究。 On the other hand, reliable alternatives to animal experimentation may not always be available. Supporters of the use of animals in medical research believe that a certain amount of suffering on the part of mice or rats can be justified if human lives are saved.They argue that opponents of such research might feel