第一篇货物买卖法lec-6(下)买卖合同效PPT课件.pptVIP

lec-6

Lec-6教学内容：

2-4国际货物买卖合同的效力

2-4.1承诺的生效要约的生效

2-4.2承诺的生效合同的成立

2-4.3合同的成立合同的效力

2-4.4订约意图（legalintention）

达成合意（consent）

合法目的（legality）辨析

2-4.5合同的形式（form）;

2-4

国际货物买卖合同的效力;上周主要内容回顾：;2-4.1要约的生效承诺的生效;2-4.2承诺的生效合同的成立

;2-4.3合同的成立合同的效力;(RoseFrankCo.vCromptonBrosLtd)

abusinessagreementdrawnupbetweenaBritishcompanyandanAmericanfirm.Ithadallthesignsofbeinglegallybindingagreementbutcontainedthefollowingclause

“thisagreementisnotenteredinto,noristhismemorandumwrittenasaformalorlegalagreement

andshallnotbesubjecttolegaljurisdictioninthelawcourts…butitisonlyadefiniteexpressionandrecordofthepurposeandintentionofthepartiesconcernedtowhichtheyeachhonorablypledgethemselves…”

legalintentioninvolvedbytheparties?

;“thisagreementisnotenteredinto,noristhismemorandumwrittenasaformalorlegalagreementandshallnotbesubjecttolegaljurisdictioninthelawcourts…butitisonlyadefiniteexpressionandrecordofthepurposeandintentionofthepartiesconcernedtowhichtheyeachhonorablypledgethemselves…”

(参考译文：所订立的本协议或备忘录并不是正式文件或法律协议,也不受法院管辖，它只是记载了合同当事人订约的愿望和目的，为此当事人为了荣誉承诺如下……)

; thelegaleffectofhonorclause:

Contractcontainingan“honorclause”isnotlegallyeffective.Thecontractisactuallyregardedashonorableagreement,whichhasnoanylegalbindingforceupontheparties,althoughthecontractfunctionstopromotebothpartiestocarryitoutmorally.

Therefore,“honorclause”incontractrebutsthepresumptionthatagreementsofabusinessnatureareintendedtobebinding.;Rebuttalofpresumption2;Decision:

No，contractexistedbecausebothpartieshadnolegalintentionasBrown‘sworkwasvoluntary.

InChinavoluntarycontractisnotregardedaslegalcontractasisofmoralnature,andthusshouldnotb