临床输血检验中应用聚凝胺技术、盐水法的结果比较研究-当代护理.docx

-150-

临床输血检验中应用聚凝胺技术、盐水法的结果比较研究

【摘要】目的比较探究临床输血检验中应用聚凝胺技术、盐水法的结果。方法将我院于2023年1月-2023年12月收治的84例需输血患者作为研究对象，通过随机数字表法分为对照组与观察组，每组各42例。对照组应用盐水法行交叉配血试验，观察组应用聚凝胺技术行交叉配血试验，对比两组检验效果。结果观察组阳性检出率、准确度、灵敏度、稳定性均高于对照组，且组间交叉配血试验用时、输血不良反应发生率低于对照组，组间差异显著（P＜0.05）。结论临床输血检验中应用聚凝胺技术临床价值高于盐水法，且其操作简便，准确度、灵敏度、稳定性较高，还可提高阳性检出率，降低交叉配血试验用时及输血不良反应发生风险。

【关键词】临床输血检验；聚凝胺技术；盐水法；结果

【收稿日期】2024年3月10日【出刊日期】2024年5月10日【DOI】10.12208/j.cnComparativestudyontheresultsofusingpolyaminetechnologyandsalinemethodinclinicalbloodtransfusiontesting

【Abstract】ObjectiveTocompareandexploretheresultsofusingpolyaminetechnologyandsalinemethodinclinicalbloodtransfusiontesting.Methods84patientswhoneededbloodtransfusionandwereadmittedtoourhospitalfromJanuary2023toDecember2023wereselectedasthestudysubjects.Theywererandomlydividedintoacontrolgroupandanobservationgroupusingarandomnumbertablemethod,with42casesineachgroup.Thecontrolgroupwassubjectedtoacrossmatchingtestusingthesalinemethod,whiletheobservationgroupwassubjectedtoacrossmatchingtestusingthepolyaminetechnique.Thetestresultswerecomparedbetweenthetwogroups.ResultsThepositivedetectionrate,accuracy,sensitivity,andstabilityoftheobservationgroupwerehigherthanthoseofthecontrolgroup,andthecrossmatchingtesttimeandincidenceoftransfusionadversereactionsbetweengroupswerelowerthanthoseofthecontrolgroup,withsignificantdifferencesbetweengroups(P0.05).ConclusionTheapplicationofpolyaminetechnologyinclinicalbloodtransfusiontestinghashigherclinicalvaluethansalinemethod,anditiseasytooperate,withhighaccuracy,sensitivity,andstability.Itcanalsoimprovethepositivedetectionrate,reducethetimerequiredforcrossmatchingtests,andreducetheriskofadversetransfusionreactions.

【Keywords】Clinicalbloodtransfusiontesting;Polyaminete