新《体育法》第92条“体育仲裁受案范围”探析.docx

新《体育法》第92条“体育仲裁受案范围”探析

摘要：新《体育法》第9章第92条规定体育仲裁的受案范围，这是启动体育仲裁程序的先决条件。研究认为从新《体育法》颁布前5年的司法判例看，体育仲裁机构设立势在必行，但从立法意图和现实需要均可论证此机构具有补位属性。由体育纠纷救济的司法实践可知，针对非平等主体间具备“体育特殊性”的纠纷，已有民商事仲裁、劳动仲裁和诉讼体系均无法全面发挥作用，需要体育仲裁机构介入才能妥善处理。“问题导向”系体育仲裁坚持的价值选择，处罚类纠纷、注册交流类纠纷和其他竞技体育纠纷共同构成体育仲裁的受案范围，未来需要细化3大领域的具体适用标准。结合域外经验，建议降低受案范围条款的立法位阶，将体育仲裁机构受理纠纷的具体类型置于《体育仲裁规则》或《体育仲裁当事人指引手册》中，建立“立法-规则-指引”相协调的受案范围体系，以期体育仲裁机构更灵活处理体育实践中的纠纷。

关键词：体育法；体育仲裁；受案范围

Abstract：?The92ndarticleofChapter9ofthenew-revisedSportsLawstipulatesthescopeofsportsarbitration，whichisaprerequisiteforinitiatingthesportsarbitrationprocedureinChina.Theresearchhasfoundthattheestablishmentofsportsarbitrationinstitutionsisimperativebasedonjudicialprecedentsfromthepastfiveyearsofthenew-revisedSportsLaw，butbothlegislativeintentandpracticalneedsarguethatthisinstitutionhasacomplementaryfunction.Judicialpracticeinsportsdisputeresolutionshowsthatexistingarbitrationandlitigationsystemsincivilandcommercialmattersareunabletofullyfunctionindisputeswithsportsspecificityamongunequalparties.Therefore，theinterventionofsportsarbitrationinstitutionsisnecessaryforproperresolution.Aproblem-orientedapproachisthevaluechoiceupheldbysportsarbitration，withpunitivedisputes，registrationandcommunicationdisputes，andothercompetitivesportsdisputescollectivelyformingthescopeofsportsarbitration.Inthefuture，specificapplicationstandardsneedtoberefinedinthesethreemajorareas.Drawingoninternationalexperience，itissuggestedtolowerthelegislativehierarchyofthescopeofjurisdictionrules，placingthespecifictypesofdisputesacceptedbysportsarbitrationinstitutionsinthesportsarbitrationrulesorpartiesguidemanual，andalsoestablishingacoordinatedsystemofjurisdictionalscopeinvolvinglegislation-rules-guidance，whichisbeneficialtoenablesportsarbitrationinstitutionstomoreflexiblyhandled